Kinek a hangja? Közéleti részvétel, bizalom, hozzáférés, hatékonyságérzet. Kutatási beszámoló, 2026.

This report presents an independent online survey (n = 36) of members of two NGOs in two Hungarian settlements on public participation, trust in decision-making and expectations of participatory methods. The sample is small, self-selected and unrepresentative, so the findings indicate directions only. Respondents feel informed and active but see little consequence of their involvement. They believe that voting matters but that voice between elections does not. Trust is highest towards NGOs and experts and lowest towards elected representatives and parties. They want a say and feedback from authorities, but prefer prepared, filtered forms of participation to equal participation for everyone. Two thirds see a randomly selected citizens’ council as a possible alternative to elected representatives, yet hardly any would serve on one. The results point to a weakness of representation and to stratified access to democracy. Keywords: public participation; political efficacy; trust; democratic access; sortition; local governance; Hungary About the author Judit Mihalik is a social researcher and communication specialist. Her website: www.mihalikjudit.net

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24120358
Primary Topic
Political Theory and Democracy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Kinek a hangja? Közéleti részvétel, bizalom, hozzáférés, hatékonyságérzet. Kutatási beszámoló, 2026.

Judit Mihalik
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Political Theory and Democracy
article

Kinek a hangja? Közéleti részvétel, bizalom, hozzáférés, hatékonyságérzet. Kutatási beszámoló, 2026.

Judit Mihalik
article en

Abstract

This report presents an independent online survey (n = 36) of members of two NGOs in two Hungarian settlements on public participation, trust in decision-making and expectations of participatory methods. The sample is small, self-selected and unrepresentative, so the findings indicate directions only. Respondents feel informed and active but see little consequence of their involvement. They believe that voting matters but that voice between elections does not. Trust is highest towards NGOs and experts and lowest towards elected representatives and parties. They want a say and feedback from authorities, but prefer prepared, filtered forms of participation to equal participation for everyone. Two thirds see a randomly selected citizens’ council as a possible alternative to elected representatives, yet hardly any would serve on one. The results point to a weakness of representation and to stratified access to democracy. Keywords: public participation; political efficacy; trust; democratic access; sortition; local governance; Hungary About the author Judit Mihalik is a social researcher and communication specialist. Her website: www.mihalikjudit.net

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Political Theory and Democracy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon