Physics-Informed Machine Learning for Polymer Drag Reduction: Bridging Laboratory Turbulent Pipe Flow and Field-Scale Crude Oil Pipeline Operation

Polymeric drag-reducing agents (DRAs) can significantly suppress turbulent friction in crude oil pipelines. However, the design of field dosing strategies still relies on empirical rules because laboratory-scale drag-reduction (DR) measurements fail to transfer quantitatively to industrial diameters, fluids, and shear histories. In this study, we present an integrated laboratory–field–machine-learning framework that closes this gap. Systematic recirculating-loop experiments (Reynolds number of 2 × 104–1.2 × 105, four pipe diameters, 3–200 ppmw of a polyalphaolefin DRA in a model oil) established concentration–Reynolds response surfaces, first-order mechanical degradation kinetics with a wall-shear-scaling rate constant kd ∝ τw1.25, and a normalized scale-up correlation validated over an eight-fold range of controlled laboratory diameters (12.7–102.0 mm) and, after a two-parameter transfer calibration, applicable to a 711 mm trunk line. A 90-day campaign on a 720 km, 711 mm crude oil trunk line (129,600 SCADA records) yielded a mean field DR of 22.9% and a mean pumping-energy saving of 22.9%. A gradient-boosting model trained jointly on laboratory and field data predicts DR with an R2 = 0.984 and an RMSE = 0.89 percentage points, while SHAP analysis ranks Reynolds number, concentration, and pipe diameter as the variables with the largest marginal contribution. A physics-informed hybrid network constrained by the Virk maximum-drag-reduction asymptote reduces extrapolation error by 34% relative to a purely data-driven network, and a sequence-to-one LSTM forecasts field DR 24 h ahead with an RMSE ≈ 1.4 points, outperforming persistence by more than a factor of two. Bayesian multi-objective optimization of the trained surrogate identifies dosing schedules that add two to three percentage points of energy savings per DRA-treated segment, corresponding to a modeled net benefit of 1.85 M US$ yr−1 and 17.7 kt CO2 yr−1. The framework demonstrates that physics-constrained machine learning can convert routine laboratory rheometry and SCADA streams into quantitatively predictive, economically deployable drag-reduction engineering.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Processes
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14223625
Primary Topic
Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Physics-Informed Machine Learning for Polymer Drag Reduction: Bridging Laboratory Turbulent Pipe Flow and Field-Scale Crude Oil Pipeline Operation

Xingjian Deng, Yangchen Shi, Yuxia Wang, Xiaodong Dai et al.
Processes
Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
article

Physics-Informed Machine Learning for Polymer Drag Reduction: Bridging Laboratory Turbulent Pipe Flow and Field-Scale Crude Oil Pipeline Operation

Xingjian Deng, Yangchen Shi, Yuxia Wang, Xiaodong Dai, Hongyan Li, Jiatong Wang, Kun Liu, Anqi Liu
article en

Abstract

Polymeric drag-reducing agents (DRAs) can significantly suppress turbulent friction in crude oil pipelines. However, the design of field dosing strategies still relies on empirical rules because laboratory-scale drag-reduction (DR) measurements fail to transfer quantitatively to industrial diameters, fluids, and shear histories. In this study, we present an integrated laboratory–field–machine-learning framework that closes this gap. Systematic recirculating-loop experiments (Reynolds number of 2 × 104–1.2 × 105, four pipe diameters, 3–200 ppmw of a polyalphaolefin DRA in a model oil) established concentration–Reynolds response surfaces, first-order mechanical degradation kinetics with a wall-shear-scaling rate constant kd ∝ τw1.25, and a normalized scale-up correlation validated over an eight-fold range of controlled laboratory diameters (12.7–102.0 mm) and, after a two-parameter transfer calibration, applicable to a 711 mm trunk line. A 90-day campaign on a 720 km, 711 mm crude oil trunk line (129,600 SCADA records) yielded a mean field DR of 22.9% and a mean pumping-energy saving of 22.9%. A gradient-boosting model trained jointly on laboratory and field data predicts DR with an R2 = 0.984 and an RMSE = 0.89 percentage points, while SHAP analysis ranks Reynolds number, concentration, and pipe diameter as the variables with the largest marginal contribution. A physics-informed hybrid network constrained by the Virk maximum-drag-reduction asymptote reduces extrapolation error by 34% relative to a purely data-driven network, and a sequence-to-one LSTM forecasts field DR 24 h ahead with an RMSE ≈ 1.4 points, outperforming persistence by more than a factor of two. Bayesian multi-objective optimization of the trained surrogate identifies dosing schedules that add two to three percentage points of energy savings per DRA-treated segment, corresponding to a modeled net benefit of 1.85 M US$ yr−1 and 17.7 kt CO2 yr−1. The framework demonstrates that physics-constrained machine learning can convert routine laboratory rheometry and SCADA streams into quantitatively predictive, economically deployable drag-reduction engineering.

ProcessesVol. 14(22)
Shandong Institute of Petroleum and Chemical Technology (CN)
Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon