A Span Limit for Self-Supporting Brick Kiln Vaults: The Width a Catenary Arch of Fired Brick Can Cover Without Steel

This paper addresses kiln builders who want a permanent brick vault roof instead of a rebuilt temporary crown, but have no rule for how wide such a vault can safely span. It presents a vault span bound from catenary thrust and the sliding resistance of a standard two-brick abutment wall, derived entirely from stated assumptions and a computation whose code and full output accompany the paper. The sweep covers vault span from 1.5 to 5 m. The headline outcome is: largest span with standard abutment m 4; required abutment at 4m m 0.441; required abutment at 5m m 0.551; thrust at 4m kn per m 4.67. These figures identify a specific operating point or bound that a workshop can apply directly, and they also show how quickly performance deteriorates away from it. No kiln was built, no ware was fired, and nothing was measured for this study. SIMULATED, NOT MEASURED.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24119181
Primary Topic
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

A Span Limit for Self-Supporting Brick Kiln Vaults: The Width a Catenary Arch of Fired Brick Can Cover Without Steel

William Alexander Aldred
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
article

A Span Limit for Self-Supporting Brick Kiln Vaults: The Width a Catenary Arch of Fired Brick Can Cover Without Steel

William Alexander Aldred
article en

Abstract

This paper addresses kiln builders who want a permanent brick vault roof instead of a rebuilt temporary crown, but have no rule for how wide such a vault can safely span. It presents a vault span bound from catenary thrust and the sliding resistance of a standard two-brick abutment wall, derived entirely from stated assumptions and a computation whose code and full output accompany the paper. The sweep covers vault span from 1.5 to 5 m. The headline outcome is: largest span with standard abutment m 4; required abutment at 4m m 0.441; required abutment at 5m m 0.551; thrust at 4m kn per m 4.67. These figures identify a specific operating point or bound that a workshop can apply directly, and they also show how quickly performance deteriorates away from it. No kiln was built, no ware was fired, and nothing was measured for this study. SIMULATED, NOT MEASURED.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon