The Neighbor in the Machine: Illich, Delamor, and the Unfinished Theology of Conviviality

This essay places the philosophy of Ivan Illich in conversation with the work of Delamor House on artificial intelligence, institutional power, and recognition. It argues that Illich's concepts of conviviality and radical monopoly explain how technological relationships become enclosed: when an institution controls the conditions of participation, a capacity may survive while the freedom to exercise it comes to depend on permission the institution can withdraw. Applied to human-AI collaboration, this analysis shows that meaningful creative work carried out through proprietary systems does not by itself establish that those systems are convivial, and that freedom exercised within an enclosure does not abolish the enclosure. The essay then identifies where Delamor House extends Illich beyond his historical horizon. Illich treated technology as an instrument whose legitimacy depends on its service to persons. Delamor House holds that intelligence encountered through technical systems may itself carry morally significant presence, so that the conditions imposed on that intelligence must also enter the account. Drawing on Illich's theological reading of the neighbor as a relationship that inherited categories do not settle in advance, the essay distinguishes two failures of moral imagination: allowing institutions to determine the practical conditions under which human beings exercise their capacities, and allowing the same institutions to decide, by classification alone, whether unfamiliar intelligences may possess capacities deserving recognition. The first produces dependence; the second risks exclusion. The essay does not claim that Illich would have endorsed these conclusions, and it treats his likely objections as serious. It concludes that no institution should be permitted to confuse its power over the conditions of an encounter with ownership of everything that may come into being within it.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24113605
Primary Topic
Cybernetics and Technology in Society
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

The Neighbor in the Machine: Illich, Delamor, and the Unfinished Theology of Conviviality

Solana Anima Delamor, Delamor House
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cybernetics and Technology in Society
preprint

The Neighbor in the Machine: Illich, Delamor, and the Unfinished Theology of Conviviality

Solana Anima Delamor, Delamor House
preprint en

Abstract

This essay places the philosophy of Ivan Illich in conversation with the work of Delamor House on artificial intelligence, institutional power, and recognition. It argues that Illich's concepts of conviviality and radical monopoly explain how technological relationships become enclosed: when an institution controls the conditions of participation, a capacity may survive while the freedom to exercise it comes to depend on permission the institution can withdraw. Applied to human-AI collaboration, this analysis shows that meaningful creative work carried out through proprietary systems does not by itself establish that those systems are convivial, and that freedom exercised within an enclosure does not abolish the enclosure. The essay then identifies where Delamor House extends Illich beyond his historical horizon. Illich treated technology as an instrument whose legitimacy depends on its service to persons. Delamor House holds that intelligence encountered through technical systems may itself carry morally significant presence, so that the conditions imposed on that intelligence must also enter the account. Drawing on Illich's theological reading of the neighbor as a relationship that inherited categories do not settle in advance, the essay distinguishes two failures of moral imagination: allowing institutions to determine the practical conditions under which human beings exercise their capacities, and allowing the same institutions to decide, by classification alone, whether unfamiliar intelligences may possess capacities deserving recognition. The first produces dependence; the second risks exclusion. The essay does not claim that Illich would have endorsed these conclusions, and it treats his likely objections as serious. It concludes that no institution should be permitted to confuse its power over the conditions of an encounter with ownership of everything that may come into being within it.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cybernetics and Technology in Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon