The Impact of Green Finance Reform and Innovation Pilot Zones on Urban Carbon Emission Intensity: Evidence from a Difference-in-Differences Approach

Cities must cut carbon emissions per unit of output to meet the dual carbon goals, and green finance is expected to help. We study China's Green Finance Reform and Innovation Pilot Zones, launched in 2017, using a panel of 287 prefecture-level cities over 2013-2022. A difference-in-differences design with two-way fixed effects shows that treated cities lowered carbon emission intensity by about 12% relative to untreated ones, with larger reductions in later years. Two mechanisms drive this outcome: credit expands and becomes more available to low-carbon projects, and industry upgrades toward greener production instead of contracting. The effect appears almost exclusively where local financial systems are relatively developed. These results offer city-level causal evidence on green finance and argue for tailoring future reform to local financial conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2026.gt38695
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

The Impact of Green Finance Reform and Innovation Pilot Zones on Urban Carbon Emission Intensity: Evidence from a Difference-in-Differences Approach

Kaige Liu
Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

The Impact of Green Finance Reform and Innovation Pilot Zones on Urban Carbon Emission Intensity: Evidence from a Difference-in-Differences Approach

Kaige Liu
article en

Abstract

Cities must cut carbon emissions per unit of output to meet the dual carbon goals, and green finance is expected to help. We study China's Green Finance Reform and Innovation Pilot Zones, launched in 2017, using a panel of 287 prefecture-level cities over 2013-2022. A difference-in-differences design with two-way fixed effects shows that treated cities lowered carbon emission intensity by about 12% relative to untreated ones, with larger reductions in later years. Two mechanisms drive this outcome: credit expands and becomes more available to low-carbon projects, and industry upgrades toward greener production instead of contracting. The effect appears almost exclusively where local financial systems are relatively developed. These results offer city-level causal evidence on green finance and argue for tailoring future reform to local financial conditions.

Advances in Economics Management and Political SciencesVol. 310(1)
Dongbei University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon