Identification of key indicators of colorectal cancer risk in patients with diabetes mellitus using machine learning and Mendelian randomization

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have indicated that diabetes mellitus may increase the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), yet the precise associationremains unclear. To identify critical clinical predictors of CRC risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using machinelearning (ML) and to subsequently evaluate their causal relationship with CRC via Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort design was adopted, analyzing clinical records from patients with T2DM and CRC and from those with T2DM alone. Significant predictors were determined using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Four MLmodels were developed, with essential indicators defined by the overlap of top-ranked clinical variables and risk factors. Mendelian randomizationanalysis was then applied to assess causality between the key indicators (exposures) and CRC (outcome), supplemented bysensitivity tests and Steiger analysis. Reverse MR analysis was conducted to examine potential reverse causality between CRC (exposure)and the identified indicators (outcomes). RESULTS: Univariate and multivariate Cox regression revealed that age [p < 0.05, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.041, 95% confidence interval(CI) = 1.022-1.062] and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c, p < 0.05, HR = 1.176, 95% CI = 1.094-1.264) were significant risk factors. Logistic regressionwas ultimately identified as the most suitable model, from which two key indicators (age and HbA1c) were derived. Mendelianrandomization analysis demonstrated a causal effect of HbA1c on CRC, confirming HbA1c as a risk factor [odds ratio (OR) = 1.14, 95%CI = 1.01-1.28, p = 0.0336]. Sensitivity analyses and Steiger testing supported the robustness and directionality of these findings. Notably,reverse MR analysis indicated no significant causal effect of CRC on HbA1c [p inverse variance weighted = 0.07853). CONCLUSIONS: Age and HbA1c were identified as pivotal indicators, with HbA1c exhibiting a unidirectional causal association with CRC, thereby offering insights for potential therapeutic strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Endokrynologia Polska
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5603/ep.113150
Primary Topic
Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Identification of key indicators of colorectal cancer risk in patients with diabetes mellitus using machine learning and Mendelian randomization

Haiyan Shangguan, 王绍华, Xi Huang, Zuoling Xie et al.
Endokrynologia Polska
Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
article

Identification of key indicators of colorectal cancer risk in patients with diabetes mellitus using machine learning and Mendelian randomization

Haiyan Shangguan, 王绍华, Xi Huang, Zuoling Xie, Wang Zheng, Jie Li, Chenchen Wang, Ruoyu Sun
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have indicated that diabetes mellitus may increase the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), yet the precise associationremains unclear. To identify critical clinical predictors of CRC risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using machinelearning (ML) and to subsequently evaluate their causal relationship with CRC via Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort design was adopted, analyzing clinical records from patients with T2DM and CRC and from those with T2DM alone. Significant predictors were determined using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Four MLmodels were developed, with essential indicators defined by the overlap of top-ranked clinical variables and risk factors. Mendelian randomizationanalysis was then applied to assess causality between the key indicators (exposures) and CRC (outcome), supplemented bysensitivity tests and Steiger analysis. Reverse MR analysis was conducted to examine potential reverse causality between CRC (exposure)and the identified indicators (outcomes). RESULTS: Univariate and multivariate Cox regression revealed that age [p < 0.05, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.041, 95% confidence interval(CI) = 1.022-1.062] and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c, p < 0.05, HR = 1.176, 95% CI = 1.094-1.264) were significant risk factors. Logistic regressionwas ultimately identified as the most suitable model, from which two key indicators (age and HbA1c) were derived. Mendelianrandomization analysis demonstrated a causal effect of HbA1c on CRC, confirming HbA1c as a risk factor [odds ratio (OR) = 1.14, 95%CI = 1.01-1.28, p = 0.0336]. Sensitivity analyses and Steiger testing supported the robustness and directionality of these findings. Notably,reverse MR analysis indicated no significant causal effect of CRC on HbA1c [p inverse variance weighted = 0.07853). CONCLUSIONS: Age and HbA1c were identified as pivotal indicators, with HbA1c exhibiting a unidirectional causal association with CRC, thereby offering insights for potential therapeutic strategies.

Endokrynologia Polska
Zhongda Hospital Southeast University (CN), Gansu Provincial Maternal and Child Health Hospital (CN), Southeast University (CN)
Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon