The Hidden Spare Key: How Much of a Burglar's Search the Common Hiding Places Already Cover

A spare key hidden outside the house is a second front door whose lock is the obscurity of its hiding place, and obscurity can be priced. This study uses a stated distribution of hiding places among households that hide a key, from 22 percent under a mat down to single-figure novelties, and models an intruder who searches places in order of popularity at 40 seconds per place. The three commonest places, mat, fake rock and plant pot, already cover 49 percent of hidden keys; the first five places cover 66 percent and take 3.33 minutes to search; eight places cover 83 percent in 5.33 minutes. Only the tenth category, genuinely original places at 10 percent, lies outside a short search. The conclusion is that a hidden key in any commonly used place should be treated as a key handed to a patient stranger, and the safe alternatives are a coded key safe, which replaces obscurity with a combination, or a key left with a person rather than an object. SIMULATED, NOT MEASURED.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24121713
Primary Topic
Information and Cyber Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

The Hidden Spare Key: How Much of a Burglar's Search the Common Hiding Places Already Cover

William Alexander Aldred
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Information and Cyber Security
article

The Hidden Spare Key: How Much of a Burglar's Search the Common Hiding Places Already Cover

William Alexander Aldred
article en

Abstract

A spare key hidden outside the house is a second front door whose lock is the obscurity of its hiding place, and obscurity can be priced. This study uses a stated distribution of hiding places among households that hide a key, from 22 percent under a mat down to single-figure novelties, and models an intruder who searches places in order of popularity at 40 seconds per place. The three commonest places, mat, fake rock and plant pot, already cover 49 percent of hidden keys; the first five places cover 66 percent and take 3.33 minutes to search; eight places cover 83 percent in 5.33 minutes. Only the tenth category, genuinely original places at 10 percent, lies outside a short search. The conclusion is that a hidden key in any commonly used place should be treated as a key handed to a patient stranger, and the safe alternatives are a coded key safe, which replaces obscurity with a combination, or a key left with a person rather than an object. SIMULATED, NOT MEASURED.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Information and Cyber Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon