How Many Different Keys a Five-Pin Lock Really Has: Counting Usable Bitting Combinations Under an Adjacent-Cut Rule

A five-pin cylinder with six depth steps per pin is often described as offering 7,776 different keys, the value of six to the fifth power. That figure counts combinations a manufacturer cannot actually cut, because a working key must satisfy the maximum adjacent cut rule: neighbouring depths that differ too steeply produce a ramp the key cannot slide past the pins. This study enumerates all 7,776 combinations exactly and tests each against a stated adjacent-cut limit of three steps. Only 4034 combinations survive, so 48.1 percent of the advertised space is unusable, and two randomly keyed locks share a key with probability 0.0248 percent. Among 200 houses keyed at random from the usable set, the expected number of pairs sharing a key is 4.93. The figures argue for reading lock specifications by their usable combinations rather than their pin count, and for preferring six-pin cylinders or additional depth steps where key uniqueness across a street or a housing development actually matters. SIMULATED, NOT MEASURED.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24121619
Primary Topic
User Authentication and Security Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

How Many Different Keys a Five-Pin Lock Really Has: Counting Usable Bitting Combinations Under an Adjacent-Cut Rule

William Alexander Aldred
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
User Authentication and Security Systems
article

How Many Different Keys a Five-Pin Lock Really Has: Counting Usable Bitting Combinations Under an Adjacent-Cut Rule

William Alexander Aldred
article en

Abstract

A five-pin cylinder with six depth steps per pin is often described as offering 7,776 different keys, the value of six to the fifth power. That figure counts combinations a manufacturer cannot actually cut, because a working key must satisfy the maximum adjacent cut rule: neighbouring depths that differ too steeply produce a ramp the key cannot slide past the pins. This study enumerates all 7,776 combinations exactly and tests each against a stated adjacent-cut limit of three steps. Only 4034 combinations survive, so 48.1 percent of the advertised space is unusable, and two randomly keyed locks share a key with probability 0.0248 percent. Among 200 houses keyed at random from the usable set, the expected number of pairs sharing a key is 4.93. The figures argue for reading lock specifications by their usable combinations rather than their pin count, and for preferring six-pin cylinders or additional depth steps where key uniqueness across a street or a housing development actually matters. SIMULATED, NOT MEASURED.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
User Authentication and Security Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon