Non-Verbal Expression of Negative Expressiveness in English and Uzbek

Negative expressiveness, the open display of disapproval, anger, disgust, contempt, irritation or disappointment, is realised not only through lexical and grammatical means but also through a rich repertoire of non-verbal signals. This article compares how such expressiveness is encoded in facial expression, gesture, posture, gaze, proxemics, haptics and paralanguage in English and Uzbek. Using a comparative-contrastive and linguocultural approach, and drawing on research on display rules and kinesics, the study distinguishes three groups of phenomena: (1) universal signals, such as the frown, the scowl and the averted gaze; (2) shared signals whose intensity, frequency and social acceptability differ between the two communities; and (3) culture-specific or lacunar signals with no direct counterpart in the other culture. The analysis suggests that English non-verbal negativity tends to be more individual, explicit and directed at the interlocutor, whereas Uzbek non-verbal negativity is more strongly regulated by age, status, gender and the norms of respect (hurmat), and is therefore more often conveyed through restraint, avoidance, silence and somatic idiom. The findings have implications for translation, foreign-language teaching and intercultural communication.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
HSR (London)
Published
2026-11-08
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Non-Verbal Expression of Negative Expressiveness in English and Uzbek

Turgunov Shukhratjon
HSR (London)
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
article

Non-Verbal Expression of Negative Expressiveness in English and Uzbek

Turgunov Shukhratjon
article en

Abstract

Negative expressiveness, the open display of disapproval, anger, disgust, contempt, irritation or disappointment, is realised not only through lexical and grammatical means but also through a rich repertoire of non-verbal signals. This article compares how such expressiveness is encoded in facial expression, gesture, posture, gaze, proxemics, haptics and paralanguage in English and Uzbek. Using a comparative-contrastive and linguocultural approach, and drawing on research on display rules and kinesics, the study distinguishes three groups of phenomena: (1) universal signals, such as the frown, the scowl and the averted gaze; (2) shared signals whose intensity, frequency and social acceptability differ between the two communities; and (3) culture-specific or lacunar signals with no direct counterpart in the other culture. The analysis suggests that English non-verbal negativity tends to be more individual, explicit and directed at the interlocutor, whereas Uzbek non-verbal negativity is more strongly regulated by age, status, gender and the norms of respect (hurmat), and is therefore more often conveyed through restraint, avoidance, silence and somatic idiom. The findings have implications for translation, foreign-language teaching and intercultural communication.

HSR (London)
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon