History of miscarriage and quality of life in couples undergoing medically assisted reproduction: an exploratory couple-based cross-sectional study

Background Miscarriage is associated with psychological distress, but its relationship with quality of life in couples undergoing medically assisted reproduction (MAR) remains insufficiently studied, particularly in male partners. We explored whether a history of miscarriage, previous pregnancy, or live birth was associated with quality of life in women and their partners. Methods In this secondary, exploratory analysis of a cross-sectional study, 100 heterosexual couples undergoing MAR at a university hospital in Zagreb, Croatia, completed the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF and the Copenhagen Multi-Centre Psychosocial Infertility (COMPI) Fertility Problem Stress Scale. We used t tests, multivariate analysis of variance, and sex-stratified stepwise regression (19 candidate variables), with adjusted, bootstrap, and dyadic mixed-model sensitivity analyses. Results Of the women, 49% had a previous pregnancy, 8% a live birth, and 26% a miscarriage. Women with a history of miscarriage reported lower overall quality of life than women without (mean 3.77 vs 4.11; p = 0.008; Cohen’s d = 0.61) and than previously pregnant women without a miscarriage (4.18; p = 0.007), whereas never-pregnant women and previously pregnant women without a miscarriage did not differ. Of the four domains, only psychological health differed after Bonferroni adjustment. Miscarriage was the only variable retained in the stepwise model for women (β = −0.268, p = 0.008); in men, personal infertility-related stress (β = −0.284, p = 0.004) and the partner’s history of miscarriage (β = −0.236, p = 0.017) were retained. The association persisted after adjustment for age and personal infertility-related stress and did not differ between partners. Quality of life did not differ by the number of miscarriages or the time since the loss, but these subgroups were small. Conclusions In this exploratory, single-center study, a history of miscarriage, rather than previous pregnancy as such, was associated with lower quality of life in women undergoing MAR and in their partners. These associative, hypothesis-generating findings require confirmation in adequately powered prospective studies that capture the timing, sequence, and cumulative burden of reproductive events.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Endocrinology
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2026.2004986
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

History of miscarriage and quality of life in couples undergoing medically assisted reproduction: an exploratory couple-based cross-sectional study

Lone Schmidt, Dejan Ljiljak, Marina Merkaš, Ivan Grbavac et al.
Frontiers in Endocrinology
Reproductive Health and Technologies
article

History of miscarriage and quality of life in couples undergoing medically assisted reproduction: an exploratory couple-based cross-sectional study

Lone Schmidt, Dejan Ljiljak, Marina Merkaš, Ivan Grbavac, Krunoslav Kuna
article en

Abstract

Background Miscarriage is associated with psychological distress, but its relationship with quality of life in couples undergoing medically assisted reproduction (MAR) remains insufficiently studied, particularly in male partners. We explored whether a history of miscarriage, previous pregnancy, or live birth was associated with quality of life in women and their partners. Methods In this secondary, exploratory analysis of a cross-sectional study, 100 heterosexual couples undergoing MAR at a university hospital in Zagreb, Croatia, completed the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF and the Copenhagen Multi-Centre Psychosocial Infertility (COMPI) Fertility Problem Stress Scale. We used t tests, multivariate analysis of variance, and sex-stratified stepwise regression (19 candidate variables), with adjusted, bootstrap, and dyadic mixed-model sensitivity analyses. Results Of the women, 49% had a previous pregnancy, 8% a live birth, and 26% a miscarriage. Women with a history of miscarriage reported lower overall quality of life than women without (mean 3.77 vs 4.11; p = 0.008; Cohen’s d = 0.61) and than previously pregnant women without a miscarriage (4.18; p = 0.007), whereas never-pregnant women and previously pregnant women without a miscarriage did not differ. Of the four domains, only psychological health differed after Bonferroni adjustment. Miscarriage was the only variable retained in the stepwise model for women (β = −0.268, p = 0.008); in men, personal infertility-related stress (β = −0.284, p = 0.004) and the partner’s history of miscarriage (β = −0.236, p = 0.017) were retained. The association persisted after adjustment for age and personal infertility-related stress and did not differ between partners. Quality of life did not differ by the number of miscarriages or the time since the loss, but these subgroups were small. Conclusions In this exploratory, single-center study, a history of miscarriage, rather than previous pregnancy as such, was associated with lower quality of life in women undergoing MAR and in their partners. These associative, hypothesis-generating findings require confirmation in adequately powered prospective studies that capture the timing, sequence, and cumulative burden of reproductive events.

Frontiers in EndocrinologyVol. 17
University of Copenhagen (DK), Catholic University of Croatia (HR), Sisters of Charity Hospital (HR)
Reproductive Health and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon