Applying the Mountain Model for Evidence-Based Practice Program Evaluation to Academic Nursing
BACKGROUND: Program evaluation is required by accrediting and regulatory bodies and is critical for sustaining robust, evidence-based improvements at the program level. Still, educators struggle to consistently apply appropriate evaluation frameworks. The inherent complexity and interdependence of curricular components render systematic program evaluation both daunting and labor-intensive. METHOD: This manuscript provides guidance on applying the Mountain Model for Evidence-Based Practice Program Evaluation (MM). The MM emphasizes problem identification, evidence synthesis, and the strategic selection of a program evaluation framework to support curricular improvements in academic nursing programs. RESULTS: The authors provide practical guidance and recommendations based on a nationally recognized initiative that uses this approach. CONCLUSION: As nursing education continues to evolve, the MM offers an accessible, evidence-informed approach that empowers academic nurses to achieve meaningful, sustainable program outcomes.
Authors
- Jennifer Wilson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4027-8130)
- Christina L. Stacy (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2726-2612)
- Jayne Jennings Dunlap (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7371-2741)
- Veronica S. King
Institutions
- Texas Woman's University (US)
- The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Nursing Education
- Published
- 2026-11-09
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20261012-02
- Primary Topic
- Health Sciences Research and Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00