Applying the Mountain Model for Evidence-Based Practice Program Evaluation to Academic Nursing

BACKGROUND: Program evaluation is required by accrediting and regulatory bodies and is critical for sustaining robust, evidence-based improvements at the program level. Still, educators struggle to consistently apply appropriate evaluation frameworks. The inherent complexity and interdependence of curricular components render systematic program evaluation both daunting and labor-intensive. METHOD: This manuscript provides guidance on applying the Mountain Model for Evidence-Based Practice Program Evaluation (MM). The MM emphasizes problem identification, evidence synthesis, and the strategic selection of a program evaluation framework to support curricular improvements in academic nursing programs. RESULTS: The authors provide practical guidance and recommendations based on a nationally recognized initiative that uses this approach. CONCLUSION: As nursing education continues to evolve, the MM offers an accessible, evidence-informed approach that empowers academic nurses to achieve meaningful, sustainable program outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Nursing Education
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20261012-02
Primary Topic
Health Sciences Research and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Applying the Mountain Model for Evidence-Based Practice Program Evaluation to Academic Nursing

Jennifer Wilson, Christina L. Stacy, Jayne Jennings Dunlap, Veronica S. King
Journal of Nursing Education
Health Sciences Research and Education
article

Applying the Mountain Model for Evidence-Based Practice Program Evaluation to Academic Nursing

Jennifer Wilson, Christina L. Stacy, Jayne Jennings Dunlap, Veronica S. King
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Program evaluation is required by accrediting and regulatory bodies and is critical for sustaining robust, evidence-based improvements at the program level. Still, educators struggle to consistently apply appropriate evaluation frameworks. The inherent complexity and interdependence of curricular components render systematic program evaluation both daunting and labor-intensive. METHOD: This manuscript provides guidance on applying the Mountain Model for Evidence-Based Practice Program Evaluation (MM). The MM emphasizes problem identification, evidence synthesis, and the strategic selection of a program evaluation framework to support curricular improvements in academic nursing programs. RESULTS: The authors provide practical guidance and recommendations based on a nationally recognized initiative that uses this approach. CONCLUSION: As nursing education continues to evolve, the MM offers an accessible, evidence-informed approach that empowers academic nurses to achieve meaningful, sustainable program outcomes.

Journal of Nursing Education
Texas Woman's University (US), The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
Health Sciences Research and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Applying the Mountain Model for Evidence-Based Practice Program Evaluation to Academic Nursing — Jennifer Wilson, Christina L. Stacy, et al. · Journal of Nursing Education (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS