Meaning through Relations: Lévi-Strauss and Large Language Models

Claude Lévi-Strauss’s structuralism offers a useful perspective on large language models (LLMs) through its emphasis on relationships within systems of meaning. This paper recalls relational meaning, oppositions and mediation, transformations, and bricolage, illustrating these ideas through Lévi-Strauss’s analysis of myth and an everyday example of gift-giving. It then examines their connections with contextual representations and generative processes in LLMs. These connections support a productive comparison, although similarities do not establish that language models implement or validate structuralist theory. Practical implications include assessing whether models preserve relevant relationships across reformulations, examining the cultural categories expressed in their responses, and distinguishing coherent explanations from empirically justified claims. Structuralism can inform the interpretation and evaluation of LLM behaviour, while LLMs offer opportunities to investigate how relationships are learned, represented and transformed. The comparison therefore provides a basis for exploring meaning and creativity, with attention to the differences between linguistic competence, cultural understanding and knowledge of the world.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
SocArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/64bnk_v1
Primary Topic
Cybernetics and Technology in Society
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Meaning through Relations: Lévi-Strauss and Large Language Models

Ulrich Mansmann
SocArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Cybernetics and Technology in Society
preprint

Meaning through Relations: Lévi-Strauss and Large Language Models

Ulrich Mansmann
preprint en

Abstract

Claude Lévi-Strauss’s structuralism offers a useful perspective on large language models (LLMs) through its emphasis on relationships within systems of meaning. This paper recalls relational meaning, oppositions and mediation, transformations, and bricolage, illustrating these ideas through Lévi-Strauss’s analysis of myth and an everyday example of gift-giving. It then examines their connections with contextual representations and generative processes in LLMs. These connections support a productive comparison, although similarities do not establish that language models implement or validate structuralist theory. Practical implications include assessing whether models preserve relevant relationships across reformulations, examining the cultural categories expressed in their responses, and distinguishing coherent explanations from empirically justified claims. Structuralism can inform the interpretation and evaluation of LLM behaviour, while LLMs offer opportunities to investigate how relationships are learned, represented and transformed. The comparison therefore provides a basis for exploring meaning and creativity, with attention to the differences between linguistic competence, cultural understanding and knowledge of the world.

SocArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Cybernetics and Technology in Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon