Procedural Alignment and Adaptation among Left-handed Dental Students in a Private Institution in Iloilo: A Mixed-methods Inquiry

Background: Dental education requires precise psychomotor skills, appropriate instrument handling and effective clinical positioning. However, left-handed dental students often encounter challenges in predominantly right-handed instructional and clinical environments. Understanding procedural alignment and the strategies these students use to adapt is important for identifying barriers to their clinical learning experiences. Aims: To determine the level of procedural alignment and adaptation among left-handed dental students and examine the relationship between procedural alignment and cognitive, physical, experiential, and overall adaptation. Study Design: Explanatory sequential mixed-methods study. Place and Duration of Study: College of Dentistry of a private dental institution in Iloilo City, Philippines, during the second semester of Academic Year 2025–2026. Methodology: The quantitative phase included 34 left-handed dental students from the third to sixth year, selected through complete enumeration. A researcher-made questionnaire measured procedural alignment and adaptation using a five-point Likert scale. Ten participants were purposively selected for semi-structured interviews. Descriptive statistics and Pearson’s correlation were used for quantitative analysis, while interview data were analysed thematically. The findings were integrated through a joint display. Results: Procedural alignment was moderate (M = 2.97, SD = 0.68). Adaptation was high overall (M = 4.02, SD = 0.42), including cognitive (M = 3.79, SD = 0.47), physical (M = 4.10, SD = 0.49), and experiential adaptation (M = 4.18, SD = 0.46). No statistically significant relationship was found between procedural alignment and cognitive (r = .19, P = .29), physical (r = .32, P = .07), experiential (r = .25, P = .15), or overall adaptation (r = .29, P = .10). Interview findings described difficulties with right-handed demonstrations, equipment placement, positioning, and instrument handling. Students reported using mental visualisation, posture and equipment adjustments, repeated practice, peer learning, and individualised techniques. Conclusion: Left-handed dental students reported moderate procedural alignment but high adaptation. Their adaptation appeared to involve personal strategies and continued practice, and was not significantly associated with procedural alignment alone. Inclusive demonstrations, flexible clinical arrangements, and accessible equipment may support their learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/ajds/2026/v9i1415
Primary Topic
Occupational health in dentistry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Procedural Alignment and Adaptation among Left-handed Dental Students in a Private Institution in Iloilo: A Mixed-methods Inquiry

Stephanie Dane D. Rafols, Erin Marie H. Latoreno, Alyana Beatriz A. Trinidad, Jenny B. Palma et al.
Occupational health in dentistry
article

Procedural Alignment and Adaptation among Left-handed Dental Students in a Private Institution in Iloilo: A Mixed-methods Inquiry

Stephanie Dane D. Rafols, Erin Marie H. Latoreno, Alyana Beatriz A. Trinidad, Jenny B. Palma, Junel E. Flores, Shannen Heart A. Abolucion
article en

Abstract

Background: Dental education requires precise psychomotor skills, appropriate instrument handling and effective clinical positioning. However, left-handed dental students often encounter challenges in predominantly right-handed instructional and clinical environments. Understanding procedural alignment and the strategies these students use to adapt is important for identifying barriers to their clinical learning experiences. Aims: To determine the level of procedural alignment and adaptation among left-handed dental students and examine the relationship between procedural alignment and cognitive, physical, experiential, and overall adaptation. Study Design: Explanatory sequential mixed-methods study. Place and Duration of Study: College of Dentistry of a private dental institution in Iloilo City, Philippines, during the second semester of Academic Year 2025–2026. Methodology: The quantitative phase included 34 left-handed dental students from the third to sixth year, selected through complete enumeration. A researcher-made questionnaire measured procedural alignment and adaptation using a five-point Likert scale. Ten participants were purposively selected for semi-structured interviews. Descriptive statistics and Pearson’s correlation were used for quantitative analysis, while interview data were analysed thematically. The findings were integrated through a joint display. Results: Procedural alignment was moderate (M = 2.97, SD = 0.68). Adaptation was high overall (M = 4.02, SD = 0.42), including cognitive (M = 3.79, SD = 0.47), physical (M = 4.10, SD = 0.49), and experiential adaptation (M = 4.18, SD = 0.46). No statistically significant relationship was found between procedural alignment and cognitive (r = .19, P = .29), physical (r = .32, P = .07), experiential (r = .25, P = .15), or overall adaptation (r = .29, P = .10). Interview findings described difficulties with right-handed demonstrations, equipment placement, positioning, and instrument handling. Students reported using mental visualisation, posture and equipment adjustments, repeated practice, peer learning, and individualised techniques. Conclusion: Left-handed dental students reported moderate procedural alignment but high adaptation. Their adaptation appeared to involve personal strategies and continued practice, and was not significantly associated with procedural alignment alone. Inclusive demonstrations, flexible clinical arrangements, and accessible equipment may support their learning.

Vol. 9(1)
Iloilo Doctors' College (PH)
Occupational health in dentistry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon