Redefining Research Priorities for Youth and Family Behavioral Health in the United States: Results from an Expert Consensus Process

Decision-makers in U.S. public behavioral health systems need reliable evidence on effective policies and practices to effectively navigate a landscape characterized by resource constraints and workforce challenges. To identify the highest priority information needs and research priorities of the youth behavioral health field, we engaged 60 research producers and researcher users in an expert consensus process that included two phases: (1) a pre-summit survey and (2) an in-person summit that included a Nominal Group Process (NGP). Participants included academic researchers, state behavioral health and Medicaid decision-makers, youth and family advocacy leaders, federal funders, and providers from 22 states. Results of the survey identified workforce development (41% of respondents), return on investment analysis (33%), and cross-system collaboration (33%) as top priorities. During the expert summit, participants reviewed survey results, discussed priority information needs, and engaged in an NGP that generated and ranked 191 recommendations. Highest-ranked information needs included evidence-based policy and financing options for cross-system interventions (16 votes), peer support best practices (16 votes), and rapid service scaling methodologies (15 votes). Research users were more likely than research producers to prioritize research on specific populations, including young children, youth with intellectual/developmental disorders, and transition-aged youth. Both groups prioritized research on effective financing strategies, cross-system collaboration, and workforce development. Results provide a research agenda for the U.S. youth behavioral health field that prioritizes expansion of the knowledge base on effective system and policy strategies and greater collaboration between researcher producers and research users to meet real-world information needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-026-01535-5
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Redefining Research Priorities for Youth and Family Behavioral Health in the United States: Results from an Expert Consensus Process

Michelle D. Zabel, F. Tony Bonadio, Eric J. Bruns, Alex R. Dopp et al.
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Redefining Research Priorities for Youth and Family Behavioral Health in the United States: Results from an Expert Consensus Process

Michelle D. Zabel, F. Tony Bonadio, Eric J. Bruns, Alex R. Dopp, Kimberly Hoagwood, Genevieve Graaf
article en

Abstract

Decision-makers in U.S. public behavioral health systems need reliable evidence on effective policies and practices to effectively navigate a landscape characterized by resource constraints and workforce challenges. To identify the highest priority information needs and research priorities of the youth behavioral health field, we engaged 60 research producers and researcher users in an expert consensus process that included two phases: (1) a pre-summit survey and (2) an in-person summit that included a Nominal Group Process (NGP). Participants included academic researchers, state behavioral health and Medicaid decision-makers, youth and family advocacy leaders, federal funders, and providers from 22 states. Results of the survey identified workforce development (41% of respondents), return on investment analysis (33%), and cross-system collaboration (33%) as top priorities. During the expert summit, participants reviewed survey results, discussed priority information needs, and engaged in an NGP that generated and ranked 191 recommendations. Highest-ranked information needs included evidence-based policy and financing options for cross-system interventions (16 votes), peer support best practices (16 votes), and rapid service scaling methodologies (15 votes). Research users were more likely than research producers to prioritize research on specific populations, including young children, youth with intellectual/developmental disorders, and transition-aged youth. Both groups prioritized research on effective financing strategies, cross-system collaboration, and workforce development. Results provide a research agenda for the U.S. youth behavioral health field that prioritizes expansion of the knowledge base on effective system and policy strategies and greater collaboration between researcher producers and research users to meet real-world information needs.

Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
RAND Corporation (US), University of Connecticut (US), The University of Texas at Arlington (US), University of Washington (US), NYU Langone Health (US)
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon