Machine Learning-Based Classification of Plastic Combustion Emissions Using Multi-Sensor Data

Open burning of plastic waste releases particulate and gaseous pollutants whose profiles vary with polymer composition and combustion behavior. This study evaluated a multi-sensor machine-learning approach for classifying emissions from six common plastics: high-density polyethylene (HDPE), low-density polyethylene (LDPE), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polypropylene (PP), polystyrene (PS), and polyvinyl chloride (PVC). The dataset comprised 2,160 observations (360 per class). Classification used six emission variables: PM1, PM2.5, PM10, CO2, CO, and total volatile organic compounds (TVOC), while relative humidity and temperature were analyzed separately as smoke-collection-chamber conditions. Kruskal-Wallis tests showed significant differences among plastic classes for all particulate and gaseous variables. Gradient Boosting (GB), Random Forest (RF), and k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) were optimized using the same randomized hyperparameter-search framework with stratified five-fold cross-validation. GB achieved the highest performance, with a cross-validated macro-F1 of 95.95%, test accuracy of 96.76%, and test macro-F1 of 96.75%. Cross-validated permutation importance identified CO2 as the most influential predictor, followed by PM10, CO, PM2.5, PM1, and TVOC. Exhaustive evaluation of 57 feature combinations identified PM1, PM2.5, and CO2 as the most parsimonious subset; the corresponding three-feature GB model retained 96.06% test accuracy and 96.05% macro-F1. The learning curve showed a 3.26-percentage-point train-validation gap at the largest training size. These results demonstrate strong discrimination of controlled plastic-combustion emission patterns, although mixed-waste, variable-combustion, and long-term sensor-drift validation is required before field application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment and Natural Resources Journal
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32526/ennrj/25/20250290
Primary Topic
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Machine Learning-Based Classification of Plastic Combustion Emissions Using Multi-Sensor Data

Hari Arief Dharmawan, Arinto Yudi Ponco Wardoyo, Unggul P. Juswono, Yahya Efendi et al.
Environment and Natural Resources Journal
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
article

Machine Learning-Based Classification of Plastic Combustion Emissions Using Multi-Sensor Data

Hari Arief Dharmawan, Arinto Yudi Ponco Wardoyo, Unggul P. Juswono, Yahya Efendi, Maria Pramundhitya Wishnu Wardhani, Renetha Salma Myesha A Asmoro
article en

Abstract

Open burning of plastic waste releases particulate and gaseous pollutants whose profiles vary with polymer composition and combustion behavior. This study evaluated a multi-sensor machine-learning approach for classifying emissions from six common plastics: high-density polyethylene (HDPE), low-density polyethylene (LDPE), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polypropylene (PP), polystyrene (PS), and polyvinyl chloride (PVC). The dataset comprised 2,160 observations (360 per class). Classification used six emission variables: PM1, PM2.5, PM10, CO2, CO, and total volatile organic compounds (TVOC), while relative humidity and temperature were analyzed separately as smoke-collection-chamber conditions. Kruskal-Wallis tests showed significant differences among plastic classes for all particulate and gaseous variables. Gradient Boosting (GB), Random Forest (RF), and k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) were optimized using the same randomized hyperparameter-search framework with stratified five-fold cross-validation. GB achieved the highest performance, with a cross-validated macro-F1 of 95.95%, test accuracy of 96.76%, and test macro-F1 of 96.75%. Cross-validated permutation importance identified CO2 as the most influential predictor, followed by PM10, CO, PM2.5, PM1, and TVOC. Exhaustive evaluation of 57 feature combinations identified PM1, PM2.5, and CO2 as the most parsimonious subset; the corresponding three-feature GB model retained 96.06% test accuracy and 96.05% macro-F1. The learning curve showed a 3.26-percentage-point train-validation gap at the largest training size. These results demonstrate strong discrimination of controlled plastic-combustion emission patterns, although mixed-waste, variable-combustion, and long-term sensor-drift validation is required before field application.

Environment and Natural Resources JournalVol. 25(1)
University of Brawijaya (ID)
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon