Inforatio Technique and Foot Ulcer Closure Among Patients With Diabetes

Importance Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are common complications of diabetes, a disease increasing in prevalence worldwide. Novel adjunctive treatments that are affordable and feasible to implement in both high- and low-income settings are urgently needed. Objective To assess whether the inforatio technique promotes healing of DFUs compared with standard of care (SOC). Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter, evaluator-blinded randomized clinical trial was conducted at 4 outpatient clinics specializing in wound care in Denmark from February 15, 2022, to December 18, 2024. One-year medical record follow-up was completed August 14, 2025. Participants included patients with noninfected Wagner grade 1 DFUs. Interventions Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive the inforatio technique every third week for 12 weeks with SOC or SOC only. The inforatio technique involved making incisions on wound beds with 2-mm biopsy punch tools. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the proportion of ulcers achieving closure within 20 weeks. Secondary outcomes were health-related and disease-specific quality of life. Safety outcomes included serious and target ulcer–related adverse events. Results A total of 101 patients were randomized, of whom 100 had DFUs and were included in the primary analysis (49 in the inforatio group and 51 in the SOC only group; 85 men; mean [SD] age, 64.4 [11.4] years; median ulcer size, 0.76 [range, 0.09-23.23] cm 2 ). Twenty-four patients in the inforatio group (49.0%) vs 14 in the SOC-only group (27.5%) achieved ulcer closure within 20 weeks (adjusted odds ratio, 3.01 [95% CI, 1.20-7.58]; P = .02). No between-group difference was found in quality of life change from baseline to 20 weeks. Within 20 weeks, 7 patients in the inforatio group vs 13 in the SOC-only group experienced the serious adverse events, including death, amputation, or target ulcer–related hospitalization (relative risk, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.24-1.29]; P = .25), and 16 patients in the inforatio group vs 30 in the SOC-only group experienced target ulcer–related adverse events (relative risk, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.35-0.88]; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, the inforatio technique improved DFU healing compared with SOC alone. Fewer ulcer-related adverse events were also observed with the inforatio technique, although this exploratory finding should be interpreted cautiously. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05189470

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Network Open
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.42733
Primary Topic
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Inforatio Technique and Foot Ulcer Closure Among Patients With Diabetes

Tue Smith Jørgensen, Malene Ringholm Bæk Larsen, Stig Brorson, Sahar Moeini et al.
JAMA Network Open
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
article

Inforatio Technique and Foot Ulcer Closure Among Patients With Diabetes

Tue Smith Jørgensen, Malene Ringholm Bæk Larsen, Stig Brorson, Sahar Moeini, Hans Gottlieb
article en

Abstract

Importance Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are common complications of diabetes, a disease increasing in prevalence worldwide. Novel adjunctive treatments that are affordable and feasible to implement in both high- and low-income settings are urgently needed. Objective To assess whether the inforatio technique promotes healing of DFUs compared with standard of care (SOC). Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter, evaluator-blinded randomized clinical trial was conducted at 4 outpatient clinics specializing in wound care in Denmark from February 15, 2022, to December 18, 2024. One-year medical record follow-up was completed August 14, 2025. Participants included patients with noninfected Wagner grade 1 DFUs. Interventions Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive the inforatio technique every third week for 12 weeks with SOC or SOC only. The inforatio technique involved making incisions on wound beds with 2-mm biopsy punch tools. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the proportion of ulcers achieving closure within 20 weeks. Secondary outcomes were health-related and disease-specific quality of life. Safety outcomes included serious and target ulcer–related adverse events. Results A total of 101 patients were randomized, of whom 100 had DFUs and were included in the primary analysis (49 in the inforatio group and 51 in the SOC only group; 85 men; mean [SD] age, 64.4 [11.4] years; median ulcer size, 0.76 [range, 0.09-23.23] cm 2 ). Twenty-four patients in the inforatio group (49.0%) vs 14 in the SOC-only group (27.5%) achieved ulcer closure within 20 weeks (adjusted odds ratio, 3.01 [95% CI, 1.20-7.58]; P = .02). No between-group difference was found in quality of life change from baseline to 20 weeks. Within 20 weeks, 7 patients in the inforatio group vs 13 in the SOC-only group experienced the serious adverse events, including death, amputation, or target ulcer–related hospitalization (relative risk, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.24-1.29]; P = .25), and 16 patients in the inforatio group vs 30 in the SOC-only group experienced target ulcer–related adverse events (relative risk, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.35-0.88]; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, the inforatio technique improved DFU healing compared with SOC alone. Fewer ulcer-related adverse events were also observed with the inforatio technique, although this exploratory finding should be interpreted cautiously. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05189470

JAMA Network OpenVol. 9(11)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Herlev Hospital (DK), Sjællands Universitetshospital, Nykøbing F. (DK), Zealand University Hospital Køge (DK)
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon