The Theory of Capital Settlement Blind Spots: Endogenous Cost Externalisation, Three-Stratum Lock-In and Systemic Crisis Under Capital Pricing Rules

This monograph constructs a systematic axiomatic framework for analysing structural blind spots in capital settlement systems. Grounded in three core axioms — the axiom of cutting, the axiom of lock-in, and the axiom of self-reference — it moves beyond conventional moral and individual-level explanations to demonstrate that blind spots and systemic crises are endogenous, inevitable outcomes of the capital system’s own pricing and settlement rules, rather than failures of supervision, decision-making or ethics. The work identifies four canonical forms of cost externalisation (off-balance-sheet, temporal, boundary and reputational), maps a three-stratum progression of lock-in from physical asset fixation to discursive legitimation, and unpacks the self-referential loop formed by narrative backlash and embedded third-party evaluators. It concludes that settlement blind spots cannot be eliminated once and for all, but can be effectively buffered through cognitive adjustment, countercyclical institutional design, and deliberate preservation of path redundancy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24067881
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

The Theory of Capital Settlement Blind Spots: Endogenous Cost Externalisation, Three-Stratum Lock-In and Systemic Crisis Under Capital Pricing Rules

XiangKun Wang
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
article

The Theory of Capital Settlement Blind Spots: Endogenous Cost Externalisation, Three-Stratum Lock-In and Systemic Crisis Under Capital Pricing Rules

XiangKun Wang
article en

Abstract

This monograph constructs a systematic axiomatic framework for analysing structural blind spots in capital settlement systems. Grounded in three core axioms — the axiom of cutting, the axiom of lock-in, and the axiom of self-reference — it moves beyond conventional moral and individual-level explanations to demonstrate that blind spots and systemic crises are endogenous, inevitable outcomes of the capital system’s own pricing and settlement rules, rather than failures of supervision, decision-making or ethics. The work identifies four canonical forms of cost externalisation (off-balance-sheet, temporal, boundary and reputational), maps a three-stratum progression of lock-in from physical asset fixation to discursive legitimation, and unpacks the self-referential loop formed by narrative backlash and embedded third-party evaluators. It concludes that settlement blind spots cannot be eliminated once and for all, but can be effectively buffered through cognitive adjustment, countercyclical institutional design, and deliberate preservation of path redundancy.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon