Innovations in civic sustainable agriculture through co-creation: a comparative analysis

This article tracks the development of niche innovations in civic sustainable agriculture across eleven initiatives around the world employing co-creation processes. Drawing on the food system transitions literature, the article provides a definition of civic sustainable agricultural innovations to account for the range of sustainable and civic agriculture innovations found across the cases. An inventory of innovative practices are provided and the co-creation governance factors employed in each case to achieve these practices are analyzed. The article concludes with some assertions about the promise and challenges of employing co-creation methods in advancing civic sustainable agricultural niche innovations. Certain co-creation governance practices contributing to niche innovations were found across all cases including the awareness of prevailing biospheric conditions, facilitative leadership, the use of channels for broadening and deepening engagement, and the use of collaborative platforms. However, each case presents contextual variance as evidenced in the leveraging of different combinations of other co-creation governance factors for each case. The limitations of co-creation for establishing frameworks for accountability and trust building are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2026.101219
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Innovations in civic sustainable agriculture through co-creation: a comparative analysis

Peter Kragelund, Mohamed Esham, Christopher Ansell, Fernando Cymbaluk Couri et al.
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Innovations in civic sustainable agriculture through co-creation: a comparative analysis

Peter Kragelund, Mohamed Esham, Christopher Ansell, Fernando Cymbaluk Couri, Christopher Koliba, Piyapong Boossabong, Vivian H. Y. Chu, Ainhoa Arrona, Pobsook Chamchong, Miren Larrea, Wai Fung Lam, Mark Barnes-Ricketts, Denise Barnes-Ricketts, Carolyn Hendriks, Eduardo Cesar Leão Marquez
article en

Abstract

This article tracks the development of niche innovations in civic sustainable agriculture across eleven initiatives around the world employing co-creation processes. Drawing on the food system transitions literature, the article provides a definition of civic sustainable agricultural innovations to account for the range of sustainable and civic agriculture innovations found across the cases. An inventory of innovative practices are provided and the co-creation governance factors employed in each case to achieve these practices are analyzed. The article concludes with some assertions about the promise and challenges of employing co-creation methods in advancing civic sustainable agricultural niche innovations. Certain co-creation governance practices contributing to niche innovations were found across all cases including the awareness of prevailing biospheric conditions, facilitative leadership, the use of channels for broadening and deepening engagement, and the use of collaborative platforms. However, each case presents contextual variance as evidenced in the leveraging of different combinations of other co-creation governance factors for each case. The limitations of co-creation for establishing frameworks for accountability and trust building are discussed.

Environmental Innovation and Societal TransitionsVol. 62
Australian National University (AU), Universidad de Deusto (ES), University of Kansas (US), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Danish Institute for International Studies (DK), Chiang Mai University (TH), University of Hong Kong (HK), Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka (LK), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon