Self-Reported Handicap and Pain in Multiple Sclerosis: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the London Handicap Scale and Disability Status in a Slovak Neurorehabilitation Cohort

Background/Objectives: Handicap (participation restriction) and pain are clinically important but under-investigated outcomes in multiple sclerosis (MS). We examined the London Handicap Scale (LHS) and pain (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS) in relation to disability and other clinical variables. Methods: This secondary, cross-sectional, non-interventional analysis included 65 Slovak patients with MS (study group, SG, n = 32, designated for a 12-week neurorehabilitation program; control group, CG, n = 33, waitlisted), all assessed before rehabilitation. Associations were tested with Spearman correlation (Benjamini–Hochberg-adjusted) and linear regression; groups were compared with the Mann–Whitney test. Results: Disability (EDSS) correlated with LHS (ρ = −0.667) and VAS pain (ρ = 0.457; both p < 0.001), although SF-36 measures correlated more strongly. In adjusted models, EDSS was the only significant predictor, explaining 44.1% of the variance in LHS and 21.1% in VAS pain. LHS and VAS pain did not differ between SG and CG (p = 0.936 and p = 0.770) but differed across EDSS severity subgroups (p < 0.001 and p = 0.007). Conclusions: EDSS is a significant but partial correlate of handicap and pain, supporting their assessment alongside disability staging. The baseline group comparison is descriptive and provides no evidence about the effects of neurorehabilitation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15218735
Primary Topic
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Self-Reported Handicap and Pain in Multiple Sclerosis: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the London Handicap Scale and Disability Status in a Slovak Neurorehabilitation Cohort

Wioletta Mikuľákova, Joanna Rosińćzuk, Małgorzata Paprocka‐Borowicz, Piotr Pobrotyn
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
article

Self-Reported Handicap and Pain in Multiple Sclerosis: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the London Handicap Scale and Disability Status in a Slovak Neurorehabilitation Cohort

Wioletta Mikuľákova, Joanna Rosińćzuk, Małgorzata Paprocka‐Borowicz, Piotr Pobrotyn
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Handicap (participation restriction) and pain are clinically important but under-investigated outcomes in multiple sclerosis (MS). We examined the London Handicap Scale (LHS) and pain (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS) in relation to disability and other clinical variables. Methods: This secondary, cross-sectional, non-interventional analysis included 65 Slovak patients with MS (study group, SG, n = 32, designated for a 12-week neurorehabilitation program; control group, CG, n = 33, waitlisted), all assessed before rehabilitation. Associations were tested with Spearman correlation (Benjamini–Hochberg-adjusted) and linear regression; groups were compared with the Mann–Whitney test. Results: Disability (EDSS) correlated with LHS (ρ = −0.667) and VAS pain (ρ = 0.457; both p < 0.001), although SF-36 measures correlated more strongly. In adjusted models, EDSS was the only significant predictor, explaining 44.1% of the variance in LHS and 21.1% in VAS pain. LHS and VAS pain did not differ between SG and CG (p = 0.936 and p = 0.770) but differed across EDSS severity subgroups (p < 0.001 and p = 0.007). Conclusions: EDSS is a significant but partial correlate of handicap and pain, supporting their assessment alongside disability staging. The baseline group comparison is descriptive and provides no evidence about the effects of neurorehabilitation.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(21)
Wrocław University of Science and Technology (PL), University of Prešov (SK), Wroclaw Medical University (PL)
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon