Prediction-centred active inference with stability guarantees for nonlinear delayed feedback

Abstract State reconstruction and delay compensation are central to nonlinear feedback in which commands are delayed and measurements arrive intermittently. Conventional active inference (AIF) centres the hidden-state prior on the reference, while predictor feedback takes its state from a fixed-gain observer outside the control objective, so the estimate either inherits the tracking error or ignores the reliability of the evidence. Predictor-feedback delay-aware active inference (PF-DAIF) removes this coupling. In its factorized generative model, an input-history predictor centres the state prior, time-aligned measurements with bounded adaptive precision form the sensory likelihood, and the reference enters only a projected action evaluated at a forecast of the arrival state. The stationary belief error becomes a matrix-weighted convex combination of the predictor and sensing residuals, independent of the reference, and the inference dynamics contract the belief, keep the precision bounded and dissipate the free energy. An augmented model of the sampled loop yields an exact spectral stability test for fixed delay, linear matrix inequalities for mean-square stability under switching delay and packet loss, and a common Lyapunov condition over the precision range, while a local Razumikhin-type condition covers the nonlinear plant. Simulations of a delayed linear benchmark and an underactuated quadrotor with time-varying delay, packet loss, gusts and sensor bias compare PF-DAIF with target-centred AIF and a Smith-predictor PID controller. The forecast action preserves stability over delay ranges in which present-state feedback develops a growing oscillation, the estimation error stays well below that of AIF and is insensitive to reference shifts, and the tracking accuracy matches Smith-predictor control at moderate delays.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11433367/v1
Primary Topic
Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Prediction-centred active inference with stability guarantees for nonlinear delayed feedback

Yang Lyu, Mingyue Ji, Quan Pan, Dan Zhao
Research Square
Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems
preprint

Prediction-centred active inference with stability guarantees for nonlinear delayed feedback

Yang Lyu, Mingyue Ji, Quan Pan, Dan Zhao
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract State reconstruction and delay compensation are central to nonlinear feedback in which commands are delayed and measurements arrive intermittently. Conventional active inference (AIF) centres the hidden-state prior on the reference, while predictor feedback takes its state from a fixed-gain observer outside the control objective, so the estimate either inherits the tracking error or ignores the reliability of the evidence. Predictor-feedback delay-aware active inference (PF-DAIF) removes this coupling. In its factorized generative model, an input-history predictor centres the state prior, time-aligned measurements with bounded adaptive precision form the sensory likelihood, and the reference enters only a projected action evaluated at a forecast of the arrival state. The stationary belief error becomes a matrix-weighted convex combination of the predictor and sensing residuals, independent of the reference, and the inference dynamics contract the belief, keep the precision bounded and dissipate the free energy. An augmented model of the sampled loop yields an exact spectral stability test for fixed delay, linear matrix inequalities for mean-square stability under switching delay and packet loss, and a common Lyapunov condition over the precision range, while a local Razumikhin-type condition covers the nonlinear plant. Simulations of a delayed linear benchmark and an underactuated quadrotor with time-varying delay, packet loss, gusts and sensor bias compare PF-DAIF with target-centred AIF and a Smith-predictor PID controller. The forecast action preserves stability over delay ranges in which present-state feedback develops a growing oscillation, the estimation error stays well below that of AIF and is insensitive to reference shifts, and the tracking accuracy matches Smith-predictor control at moderate delays.

Research Square
Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN), Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE)
Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon