Desire as Imparted Force: A Social-Origin Hypothesis of Wanting and Connection

I propose that wanting is shaped through the ways other people affect one’s existence. I retaintwo versions as the heart of the argument. The strong version claims that all desire content issocially imparted; the moderate version sets bare bodily states partly aside and concerns thecontent and strength of socially shaped wants. Needs lean toward bodily action and impulse,while wants lean toward thought-shaped objects and possibilities; this distinction is conceptual,not an established biological partition. I call the felt interpersonal draw pull and the proposedinfluence imparted force, without claiming a new physical force. Research on goal contagion,valuation, comparison, and social support motivates the account but does not establish that socialshaping is total. I distinguish experienced connection from evidence of reciprocity, compatibility,or safety, and being influenced from freely endorsing a course of action. Eight predictions andtwo proposed studies address observable consequences, including the limits of tracing a desire’ssource. A background glossary preserves my existing terminology without using it to explainaway contrary results. A brief universe/fabric analogy remains philosophical speculation. Nonew data are reported.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24066564
Primary Topic
Human Behavior and Motivation
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Desire as Imparted Force: A Social-Origin Hypothesis of Wanting and Connection

Cole David Withington
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Human Behavior and Motivation
preprint

Desire as Imparted Force: A Social-Origin Hypothesis of Wanting and Connection

Cole David Withington
preprint en

Abstract

I propose that wanting is shaped through the ways other people affect one’s existence. I retaintwo versions as the heart of the argument. The strong version claims that all desire content issocially imparted; the moderate version sets bare bodily states partly aside and concerns thecontent and strength of socially shaped wants. Needs lean toward bodily action and impulse,while wants lean toward thought-shaped objects and possibilities; this distinction is conceptual,not an established biological partition. I call the felt interpersonal draw pull and the proposedinfluence imparted force, without claiming a new physical force. Research on goal contagion,valuation, comparison, and social support motivates the account but does not establish that socialshaping is total. I distinguish experienced connection from evidence of reciprocity, compatibility,or safety, and being influenced from freely endorsing a course of action. Eight predictions andtwo proposed studies address observable consequences, including the limits of tracing a desire’ssource. A background glossary preserves my existing terminology without using it to explainaway contrary results. A brief universe/fabric analogy remains philosophical speculation. Nonew data are reported.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Portland State University (US)
Human Behavior and Motivation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon