Patient reimbursement in therapeutic cancer clinical trials: An 18‐year multicenter experience

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials add to the financial burden of cancer care. To expand equitable access to trials, from 2006 to 2024 the Lazarex Cancer Foundation reimbursed nonmedical expenses related to therapeutic cancer clinical trial participation. METHODS: Eligible patients were enrolled in a cancer treatment trial and had a household income of ≤700% of the federal poverty level. Expense reimbursement occurred at 50%, 75%, and 100% according to income level. This study analyzed the type, timing, and amounts (in 2024 dollars) of reimbursed expenses for trial participants. Associations between patient/trial characteristics, reimbursed amounts, and distance traveled were evaluated via t-tests, analysis of variance, and multivariate linear regression. RESULTS: Overall, 2826 individuals (64% non-Hispanic White, 97% with health insurance, with a median household income of $50,948) received at least one reimbursement. Median total per-patient reimbursement was $2128, median trial participation duration was 4.3 months, and monthly reimbursed amounts declined substantially throughout trial participation. Types of reimbursement varied by patient income: internet, ground transportation, and child/elder care were more common at lower income levels, whereas lodging and airfare were more common for higher incomes. In multivariate analysis, monthly reimbursed amount was greater among middle-tier household income quartiles (p = .003), greater distance to trial site (p < .001), and phase 1 trials (p = .001). The proportion of patients participating across income levels remained stable over time. CONCLUSIONS: Reimbursement needs during cancer clinical trial participation are dynamic and closely tied to both socioeconomic status and logistical burden, particularly travel distance and trial intensity. Financial support for these expenses may enhance trial accessibility and retention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.70625
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Patient reimbursement in therapeutic cancer clinical trials: An 18‐year multicenter experience

Ryan David Nipp, Navid Sadeghi, Carmen E. Guerra, Loren Bryant et al.
Cancer
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Patient reimbursement in therapeutic cancer clinical trials: An 18‐year multicenter experience

Ryan David Nipp, Navid Sadeghi, Carmen E. Guerra, Loren Bryant, Beverly Moy, Hala T. Borno, Dana L. Dornsife, Patrick J. Leavey, Arthi Sridhar, Sylvia Zhang, Lorna Haughton. McNeill, Jessica L. Lee, David E. Gerber, Puja J. Umaretiya, Ashley Santaniello, Sukh Makhnoon, Erin L. Williams, HEATHER KITZMAN, Caitlyn Miller, DARCY V. SPICER, Robert G. Johnson, Ang Gao, Song Zhang
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials add to the financial burden of cancer care. To expand equitable access to trials, from 2006 to 2024 the Lazarex Cancer Foundation reimbursed nonmedical expenses related to therapeutic cancer clinical trial participation. METHODS: Eligible patients were enrolled in a cancer treatment trial and had a household income of ≤700% of the federal poverty level. Expense reimbursement occurred at 50%, 75%, and 100% according to income level. This study analyzed the type, timing, and amounts (in 2024 dollars) of reimbursed expenses for trial participants. Associations between patient/trial characteristics, reimbursed amounts, and distance traveled were evaluated via t-tests, analysis of variance, and multivariate linear regression. RESULTS: Overall, 2826 individuals (64% non-Hispanic White, 97% with health insurance, with a median household income of $50,948) received at least one reimbursement. Median total per-patient reimbursement was $2128, median trial participation duration was 4.3 months, and monthly reimbursed amounts declined substantially throughout trial participation. Types of reimbursement varied by patient income: internet, ground transportation, and child/elder care were more common at lower income levels, whereas lodging and airfare were more common for higher incomes. In multivariate analysis, monthly reimbursed amount was greater among middle-tier household income quartiles (p = .003), greater distance to trial site (p < .001), and phase 1 trials (p = .001). The proportion of patients participating across income levels remained stable over time. CONCLUSIONS: Reimbursement needs during cancer clinical trial participation are dynamic and closely tied to both socioeconomic status and logistical burden, particularly travel distance and trial intensity. Financial support for these expenses may enhance trial accessibility and retention.

CancerVol. 132(22)
University of Southern California (US), Parkland Health & Hospital System (US), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), Lazarex Cancer Foundation (US), UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), Abramson Cancer Center (US), Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), Mass General Brigham (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon