Assessing demand-side policy impacts on US urban passenger transport

Abstract Demand-side policies could significantly mitigate energy use and carbon emissions of urban passenger transport. However, previous integrated assessment modeling studies often failed to fully evaluate their mitigation potential in the absence of explicit representation of urban transport dynamics. Here we adjust the global integrated assessment model GCAM to disaggregate passenger transport in the US region into the urban and inter-city subsectors. We analyze the impacts of transformative demand-side policies on US urban passenger transport service demand, mode share, energy use, and carbon emissions. We consider six demand-side policies (compact urban development , speed limit, shared mobility, remote working, fuel tax, and congestion fee) as well as a technology policy of vehicle electrification. We find that all demand-side policies could collectively reduce urban transport energy use and carbon emissions by approximately 60% from the baseline in 2050 by shifting and reducing transport demand. We also find that demand-side policies could deliver strong synergies with electric vehicle (EV) deployment. Under ambitious EV deployment, although most direct urban passenger transport emissions are mitigated, electricity demand would increase by 718 TWh from 2021 to 2050, as much as 16% of current US total electricity consumption. A full portfolio of demand-side policies could limit the increased electricity use for urban transport to 299 TWh in 2050, providing substantial benefits for energy savings. Our study shows that demand-side policies and vehicle electrification can be complementary in achieving decarbonization and other sustainability goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aebbd9
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Assessing demand-side policy impacts on US urban passenger transport

Christoph Bertram, Page G. Kyle, Xiangwen Fu
Environmental Research Letters
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
article

Assessing demand-side policy impacts on US urban passenger transport

Christoph Bertram, Page G. Kyle, Xiangwen Fu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Demand-side policies could significantly mitigate energy use and carbon emissions of urban passenger transport. However, previous integrated assessment modeling studies often failed to fully evaluate their mitigation potential in the absence of explicit representation of urban transport dynamics. Here we adjust the global integrated assessment model GCAM to disaggregate passenger transport in the US region into the urban and inter-city subsectors. We analyze the impacts of transformative demand-side policies on US urban passenger transport service demand, mode share, energy use, and carbon emissions. We consider six demand-side policies (compact urban development , speed limit, shared mobility, remote working, fuel tax, and congestion fee) as well as a technology policy of vehicle electrification. We find that all demand-side policies could collectively reduce urban transport energy use and carbon emissions by approximately 60% from the baseline in 2050 by shifting and reducing transport demand. We also find that demand-side policies could deliver strong synergies with electric vehicle (EV) deployment. Under ambitious EV deployment, although most direct urban passenger transport emissions are mitigated, electricity demand would increase by 718 TWh from 2021 to 2050, as much as 16% of current US total electricity consumption. A full portfolio of demand-side policies could limit the increased electricity use for urban transport to 299 TWh in 2050, providing substantial benefits for energy savings. Our study shows that demand-side policies and vehicle electrification can be complementary in achieving decarbonization and other sustainability goals.

Environmental Research LettersVol. 21(21)
Cornell University (US), Interdisciplinary Transformation University Austria (AT), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon