GRAVITATIONAL WAVES AS INSTANTANEOUS VARIATION OF INTERACTION

General relativity describes gravitational waves as perturbations of spacetime that propagate at c and carry energy. This article reinterprets the phenomenon within the framework of the series (Flor 2026k, 2026l, 2026m, 2026n, 2026o): interaction is instantaneous at every instant; what is called a 'gravitational wave' is the temporal variation of the intensity of gravitational interaction at a point — the same reinterpretation the series has already proposed for light (Flor 2026m, Statement 41; Flor 2026n), applied to the gravitational case. The peak is the local maximum of interaction, which occurs when the source of interaction is closest to the observer; it is not an emitted entity that travels from source to detector. A distinction is drawn between source of emission and source of interaction (Flor 2026m, 8.4): in gravitation there is no source of emission; astronomical bodies are directly sources of interaction. The article proposes the fourth experiment: a comparison between the phase of the maximum of the Moon's gravitational interaction (which occurs at closest approach) and the phase of the image (which occurs 1.3 s later), with an angular difference of ∼0.7 arcseconds. The article acknowledges that, for uniform motion, general relativity and instantaneity coincide in predicting the dominant field: the experiment tests the ontology of interaction against the naive mediated reading, not general relativity. The distinction between the two readings would appear in the radiative part of the field — which LIGO claims to measure, but whose interpretation is a conditional inference and remains an open problem. Tides are the already-observed manifestation of the local phenomenon — with a diurnal period (intensity) or semidiurnal period (gradient). The orbital decay of PSR B1913+16 (Hulse-Taylor) is examined: the binary system is open, and orbital energy is exchanged with the environment; the coincidence with the quadrupolar formula is compatible with three hypotheses, and the choice among them is declared an open problem. The series does not deny gravitational waves; it reinterprets what they are. From this reinterpretation it follows that the expected signal is about 17 orders of magnitude below LIGO's sensitivity — that is, undetectable. If the chirp is the signature of a spacetime perturbation that traveled from a cosmological source, if energy is carried by the field, if interaction is mediated — then interaction is not instantaneous, the wave is not the variation of interaction, energy is not only in the bodies, and the entire series is refuted. The article does not relativize LIGO's interpretation: it recognizes it as a bet of the series, and declares the risk.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24093862
Primary Topic
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

GRAVITATIONAL WAVES AS INSTANTANEOUS VARIATION OF INTERACTION

Ricardo de la Flor
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
article

GRAVITATIONAL WAVES AS INSTANTANEOUS VARIATION OF INTERACTION

Ricardo de la Flor
article en

Abstract

General relativity describes gravitational waves as perturbations of spacetime that propagate at c and carry energy. This article reinterprets the phenomenon within the framework of the series (Flor 2026k, 2026l, 2026m, 2026n, 2026o): interaction is instantaneous at every instant; what is called a 'gravitational wave' is the temporal variation of the intensity of gravitational interaction at a point — the same reinterpretation the series has already proposed for light (Flor 2026m, Statement 41; Flor 2026n), applied to the gravitational case. The peak is the local maximum of interaction, which occurs when the source of interaction is closest to the observer; it is not an emitted entity that travels from source to detector. A distinction is drawn between source of emission and source of interaction (Flor 2026m, 8.4): in gravitation there is no source of emission; astronomical bodies are directly sources of interaction. The article proposes the fourth experiment: a comparison between the phase of the maximum of the Moon's gravitational interaction (which occurs at closest approach) and the phase of the image (which occurs 1.3 s later), with an angular difference of ∼0.7 arcseconds. The article acknowledges that, for uniform motion, general relativity and instantaneity coincide in predicting the dominant field: the experiment tests the ontology of interaction against the naive mediated reading, not general relativity. The distinction between the two readings would appear in the radiative part of the field — which LIGO claims to measure, but whose interpretation is a conditional inference and remains an open problem. Tides are the already-observed manifestation of the local phenomenon — with a diurnal period (intensity) or semidiurnal period (gradient). The orbital decay of PSR B1913+16 (Hulse-Taylor) is examined: the binary system is open, and orbital energy is exchanged with the environment; the coincidence with the quadrupolar formula is compatible with three hypotheses, and the choice among them is declared an open problem. The series does not deny gravitational waves; it reinterprets what they are. From this reinterpretation it follows that the expected signal is about 17 orders of magnitude below LIGO's sensitivity — that is, undetectable. If the chirp is the signature of a spacetime perturbation that traveled from a cosmological source, if energy is carried by the field, if interaction is mediated — then interaction is not instantaneous, the wave is not the variation of interaction, energy is not only in the bodies, and the entire series is refuted. The article does not relativize LIGO's interpretation: it recognizes it as a bet of the series, and declares the risk.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon