Effect of Bacterial Colonisation of Recipient Wound Bed in Leg Ulcers on Graft Uptake in Split Thickness Skin Grafting in a Tertiary Care Center-A Cross Sectional Study

Background: Chronic leg ulcers are associated with prolonged morbidity and impaired quality of life. Split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) is an effective surgical intervention for wound coverage; however, successful graft uptake depends on adequate wound bed preparation, microbial control, and systemic patient factors. Bacterial colonisation may impair graft adherence and neovascularisation, resulting in partial or complete graft failure. Aim: To evaluate the effect of bacterial colonisation of recipient wound beds on split-thickness skin graft uptake in patients with leg ulcers. Materials and Methods: This hospital-based cross-sectional observational study was conducted in the Department of General Surgery, Sri Venkateswara Ramnarain Ruia Government General Hospital, Tirupati, in collaboration with the Department of Microbiology. A total of 114 patients with leg ulcers undergoing STSG were included. Preoperative wound swabs were collected for microbiological assessment. Graft uptake was evaluated on postoperative days 5–7 and categorised as complete (?95%), partial (75–94%), or poor (<75%). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS. Associations were assessed using the Chi-square test, and multinomial logistic regression was used to identify predictors of graft uptake. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Among 114 patients, 76 (66.7%) had positive wound cultures, while 38 (33.3%) were culture-negative. Staphylococcus aureus was the predominant isolate (17.5%), followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (14.0%). Complete graft uptake was observed in 68 (59.6%) patients, partial uptake in 30 (26.3%), and poor uptake in 16 (14.0%). Culture-positive wounds demonstrated significantly lower complete graft uptake (47.4%) than culture-negative wounds (84.2%) (?²=14.29, p=0.0008). Culture positivity independently increased the odds of partial uptake (OR=2.8, p=0.003) and poor uptake (OR=4.1, p=0.001). Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonisation, diabetes mellitus, prolonged ulcer duration, and larger ulcer size were also associated with adverse graft outcomes. Conclusion: Bacterial colonisation of the recipient wound bed significantly compromises STSG uptake in leg ulcers. Preoperative wound culture assessment, effective infection control, optimisation of systemic factors, and meticulous postoperative care are essential to improve graft survival and reduce graft failure. Keywords: Bacterial colonisation; Leg ulcers; Split-thickness skin grafting; Graft uptake; Wound infection

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Medical and Biomedical Studies
Published
2026-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32553/ijmbs.v10i11.3488
Primary Topic
Wound Healing and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Effect of Bacterial Colonisation of Recipient Wound Bed in Leg Ulcers on Graft Uptake in Split Thickness Skin Grafting in a Tertiary Care Center-A Cross Sectional Study

B. Sarada, Kancharla Sumana, W. Sudhakar
International Journal of Medical and Biomedical Studies
Wound Healing and Treatments
article

Effect of Bacterial Colonisation of Recipient Wound Bed in Leg Ulcers on Graft Uptake in Split Thickness Skin Grafting in a Tertiary Care Center-A Cross Sectional Study

B. Sarada, Kancharla Sumana, W. Sudhakar
article en

Abstract

Background: Chronic leg ulcers are associated with prolonged morbidity and impaired quality of life. Split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) is an effective surgical intervention for wound coverage; however, successful graft uptake depends on adequate wound bed preparation, microbial control, and systemic patient factors. Bacterial colonisation may impair graft adherence and neovascularisation, resulting in partial or complete graft failure. Aim: To evaluate the effect of bacterial colonisation of recipient wound beds on split-thickness skin graft uptake in patients with leg ulcers. Materials and Methods: This hospital-based cross-sectional observational study was conducted in the Department of General Surgery, Sri Venkateswara Ramnarain Ruia Government General Hospital, Tirupati, in collaboration with the Department of Microbiology. A total of 114 patients with leg ulcers undergoing STSG were included. Preoperative wound swabs were collected for microbiological assessment. Graft uptake was evaluated on postoperative days 5–7 and categorised as complete (?95%), partial (75–94%), or poor (<75%). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS. Associations were assessed using the Chi-square test, and multinomial logistic regression was used to identify predictors of graft uptake. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Among 114 patients, 76 (66.7%) had positive wound cultures, while 38 (33.3%) were culture-negative. Staphylococcus aureus was the predominant isolate (17.5%), followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (14.0%). Complete graft uptake was observed in 68 (59.6%) patients, partial uptake in 30 (26.3%), and poor uptake in 16 (14.0%). Culture-positive wounds demonstrated significantly lower complete graft uptake (47.4%) than culture-negative wounds (84.2%) (?²=14.29, p=0.0008). Culture positivity independently increased the odds of partial uptake (OR=2.8, p=0.003) and poor uptake (OR=4.1, p=0.001). Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonisation, diabetes mellitus, prolonged ulcer duration, and larger ulcer size were also associated with adverse graft outcomes. Conclusion: Bacterial colonisation of the recipient wound bed significantly compromises STSG uptake in leg ulcers. Preoperative wound culture assessment, effective infection control, optimisation of systemic factors, and meticulous postoperative care are essential to improve graft survival and reduce graft failure. Keywords: Bacterial colonisation; Leg ulcers; Split-thickness skin grafting; Graft uptake; Wound infection

International Journal of Medical and Biomedical StudiesVol. 10(11)
Sri Venkateswara Medical College and Ruia Hospital (IN)
Wound Healing and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon