Generative AI in Education: Opportunities, Risks and Academic Integrity

Abstract - ChatGPT and similar tools have entered universities faster than policies could be written for them. To understand what this means in practice, this paper brings together the findings of five recent peer-reviewed studies on generative AI (GenAI) in higher education, covering teaching, learning and assessment, and then turns to the situation in India. The studies are read through a thematic analysis built around four areas: academic integrity and detection, learning opportunities, privacy, bias, copyright and ethics, and policy readiness. They agree that GenAI can offer students personalised feedback and support different kinds of learners. They also agree that detection software is unreliable, and that unclear rules, weak infrastructure and limited teacher training hold back the benefits. From these findings the paper proposes a four-part framework for responsible use, with recommendations for institutions, teachers, students and policymakers. It concludes that assessment redesign, clear rules and AI literacy protect integrity better than detection tools alone, and that field research in Indian institutions is still needed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24078787
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Generative AI in Education: Opportunities, Risks and Academic Integrity

Anamika Kirve, Vaishnavi Punalkar
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Artificial Intelligence in Education
article

Generative AI in Education: Opportunities, Risks and Academic Integrity

Anamika Kirve, Vaishnavi Punalkar
article en

Abstract

Abstract - ChatGPT and similar tools have entered universities faster than policies could be written for them. To understand what this means in practice, this paper brings together the findings of five recent peer-reviewed studies on generative AI (GenAI) in higher education, covering teaching, learning and assessment, and then turns to the situation in India. The studies are read through a thematic analysis built around four areas: academic integrity and detection, learning opportunities, privacy, bias, copyright and ethics, and policy readiness. They agree that GenAI can offer students personalised feedback and support different kinds of learners. They also agree that detection software is unreliable, and that unclear rules, weak infrastructure and limited teacher training hold back the benefits. From these findings the paper proposes a four-part framework for responsible use, with recommendations for institutions, teachers, students and policymakers. It concludes that assessment redesign, clear rules and AI literacy protect integrity better than detection tools alone, and that field research in Indian institutions is still needed.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Artificial Intelligence in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon