Risk curves in enterprise risk management: linking performance targets to risk responses

Abstract Enterprise risk management links performance commitments to decisions about resources and risk responses. This paper develops an exposure-based framework for selecting those decisions under a quantitative risk-appetite criterion. Coefficients remain fixed within each assessed regime. A general formulation separates a policy-specific risk profile from the least committed expenditure needed to meet the criterion. Analytical and hypothetical examples show when resource reallocation helps, how response costs change selection, and why local marginal costs cannot price every response switch. A multi-output activity model compares expenditure and expected-total-cost objectives, tests insurance pricing and programme effectiveness, and introduces binding resource constraints. Assessing a selected plan unchanged under alternative assumptions distinguishes its robustness from the options available after reassessment. A documented input procedure and lexicographic implementation make the calculations reproducible. The framework supports financial appraisal within ERM while retaining management responsibility for objectives, criteria and approval.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11266874/v1
Primary Topic
Risk Management in Financial Firms
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Risk curves in enterprise risk management: linking performance targets to risk responses

Νικόλαος Βούρδας, Vassilis Stathopoulos
Research Square
Risk Management in Financial Firms
preprint

Risk curves in enterprise risk management: linking performance targets to risk responses

Νικόλαος Βούρδας, Vassilis Stathopoulos
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Enterprise risk management links performance commitments to decisions about resources and risk responses. This paper develops an exposure-based framework for selecting those decisions under a quantitative risk-appetite criterion. Coefficients remain fixed within each assessed regime. A general formulation separates a policy-specific risk profile from the least committed expenditure needed to meet the criterion. Analytical and hypothetical examples show when resource reallocation helps, how response costs change selection, and why local marginal costs cannot price every response switch. A multi-output activity model compares expenditure and expected-total-cost objectives, tests insurance pricing and programme effectiveness, and introduces binding resource constraints. Assessing a selected plan unchanged under alternative assumptions distinguishes its robustness from the options available after reassessment. A documented input procedure and lexicographic implementation make the calculations reproducible. The framework supports financial appraisal within ERM while retaining management responsibility for objectives, criteria and approval.

Research Square
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
Risk Management in Financial Firms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon