Lost in digitalization: on the vanishing of the individual patient in the medicine of the future

Abstract Although digital medicine promises unprecedented individualization through data-driven precision, this paper argues that the opposite trajectory could emerge. Unless medicine proceeds with caution, the patient risks being reduced to a statistical abstraction, removed from the physician’s moral and perceptual grasp, as digitalization accelerates. In the article, I discuss three possible distortions that could contribute to this trend: First, patients could be reduced to quantifiable data points through datafication. Second, several forms of bias may contribute to the homogenization of patients or the neglect of individuality. Third, virtualization in telemedicine may foster the fragmentation and depersonalization of the patient–physician encounter. Together, these developments risk diminishing rather than enhancing personalized care. The paper therefore calls for critical vigilance to ensure that technological innovation remains anchored in attentiveness to the unique, embodied individual—such that, in pursuing precision, medicine does not lose sight of the very person it seeks to serve.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13010-026-00242-1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Lost in digitalization: on the vanishing of the individual patient in the medicine of the future

Marco Stier
Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Lost in digitalization: on the vanishing of the individual patient in the medicine of the future

Marco Stier
article en

Abstract

Abstract Although digital medicine promises unprecedented individualization through data-driven precision, this paper argues that the opposite trajectory could emerge. Unless medicine proceeds with caution, the patient risks being reduced to a statistical abstraction, removed from the physician’s moral and perceptual grasp, as digitalization accelerates. In the article, I discuss three possible distortions that could contribute to this trend: First, patients could be reduced to quantifiable data points through datafication. Second, several forms of bias may contribute to the homogenization of patients or the neglect of individuality. Third, virtualization in telemedicine may foster the fragmentation and depersonalization of the patient–physician encounter. Together, these developments risk diminishing rather than enhancing personalized care. The paper therefore calls for critical vigilance to ensure that technological innovation remains anchored in attentiveness to the unique, embodied individual—such that, in pursuing precision, medicine does not lose sight of the very person it seeks to serve.

Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon