Edilizia nel Golfo e contratti di appalto. Studio comparativo tra codici civili del Golfo, diritto italiano e diritto inglese

This article examines selected developments introduced by the new Civil Transactions Law of the United Arab Emirates and the recent codification of civil law in Saudi Arabia in relation to construction contracts. Drawing on three recurring situations in construction projects—an unexpected increase in costs, defective or delayed performance, and termination by the employer—the authors compare the remedies available under these two legal systems with the approaches taken by Italian and English law. The analysis shows that the reforms make the mechanisms for restoring contractual equilibrium, intervening in performance, and obtaining compensation more explicit, while continuing to subject them to specific substantive and procedural requirements. Greater legislative clarity therefore does not diminish the importance of contractual terms, cost documentation, notices, and the rules governing performance and termination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aequitas Magazine
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24003079
Primary Topic
Comparative International Legal Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Edilizia nel Golfo e contratti di appalto. Studio comparativo tra codici civili del Golfo, diritto italiano e diritto inglese

Rodrigo Carè, Hasan ElShafiey
Aequitas Magazine
Comparative International Legal Studies
article

Edilizia nel Golfo e contratti di appalto. Studio comparativo tra codici civili del Golfo, diritto italiano e diritto inglese

Rodrigo Carè, Hasan ElShafiey
article en

Abstract

This article examines selected developments introduced by the new Civil Transactions Law of the United Arab Emirates and the recent codification of civil law in Saudi Arabia in relation to construction contracts. Drawing on three recurring situations in construction projects—an unexpected increase in costs, defective or delayed performance, and termination by the employer—the authors compare the remedies available under these two legal systems with the approaches taken by Italian and English law. The analysis shows that the reforms make the mechanisms for restoring contractual equilibrium, intervening in performance, and obtaining compensation more explicit, while continuing to subject them to specific substantive and procedural requirements. Greater legislative clarity therefore does not diminish the importance of contractual terms, cost documentation, notices, and the rules governing performance and termination.

Aequitas Magazine
Aequitas Magazine Associazione culturale di Ricerca e Studi giuridici (IT)
Comparative International Legal Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon