The Changing Role of OTC Derivatives: Hedging, Speculation and Risk Transfer

Over the counter derivatives remain central to how firms, banks and governments manage financial risk, yet the post crisis reform programme has altered the character of that risk rather than removed it. Drawing on statistics from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), progress reporting from the Financial Stability Board (FSB) and recent South African regulatory publications, this article examines hedging, speculation and risk transfer in turn and asks where risk now sits. Bilateral counterparty credit risk has been reduced through netting, margining and central clearing. In its place, the system carries greater liquidity demands, a heavier dependence on a small number of clearing and dealing institutions, and operational and data risks that are harder to measure. South Africa illustrates the transition. Rand interest rate products are still cleared bilaterally because no domestic central counterparty exists for them, while regulators have proposed mandatory clearing and stronger capital standards for nonbank providers. The article closes with the implications for risk practitioners.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24086370
Primary Topic
Risk Management in Financial Firms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

The Changing Role of OTC Derivatives: Hedging, Speculation and Risk Transfer

Dereck Zharare
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Risk Management in Financial Firms
article

The Changing Role of OTC Derivatives: Hedging, Speculation and Risk Transfer

Dereck Zharare
article en

Abstract

Over the counter derivatives remain central to how firms, banks and governments manage financial risk, yet the post crisis reform programme has altered the character of that risk rather than removed it. Drawing on statistics from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), progress reporting from the Financial Stability Board (FSB) and recent South African regulatory publications, this article examines hedging, speculation and risk transfer in turn and asks where risk now sits. Bilateral counterparty credit risk has been reduced through netting, margining and central clearing. In its place, the system carries greater liquidity demands, a heavier dependence on a small number of clearing and dealing institutions, and operational and data risks that are harder to measure. South Africa illustrates the transition. Rand interest rate products are still cleared bilaterally because no domestic central counterparty exists for them, while regulators have proposed mandatory clearing and stronger capital standards for nonbank providers. The article closes with the implications for risk practitioners.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Risk Management in Financial Firms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon