Computerised cognitive training combined with nutritional counseling in mild cognitive impairment - results of a 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial (BrainFit-nutrition study)

Abstract Background Computerized cognitive training (CCT) and nutritional interventions may improve cognitive functioning in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). This study investigated whether a combination of CCT and online nutritional counseling can improve global cognition in individuals with MCI. We also evaluated differences between MCI-specified and active control versions of the interventions. Methods In this 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial (BrainFit-Nutrition study), conducted fully remotely, participants in Germany with a psychometric diagnosis of MCI (age 60+) were randomized into four groups (Intention to treat, n = 270). For each intervention, one MCI specified and one active control version were developed (cognition: individualized CCT (iCCT) vs. basic CCT (bCCT); nutrition: whole-food plant-based nutrition (WFPB) vs. German Nutrition Society (DGE)). At baseline and after six months, cognitive functioning was assessed with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA; primary outcome: change after six months). A mixed-model ANCOVA (t0-t6, complete case strategy (CC), n = 228) was applied for the main analysis. Results All four groups achieved a significant improvement of approximately 2 points on the MoCA after six months. Estimated marginal means varied from M = 2.44 (iCCTxDGE) to M = 1.77 (iCCTxWFPB), notably without significant group differences. The 2 × 2 mixed ANCOVA revealed a significant main effect of time ( F = 3.96, p = 0.048, partial η 2 = 0.018). The specific content of the respective modalities being compared (iCCT vs. bCCT; WFPB vs. DGE-oriented counseling) did not appear to make a relevant group difference with regard to the primary outcome. After 6 months, 55% of all participants reached non-MCI values on the MoCA. Conclusion The results of this study suggest, that in people with MCI, notable improvement in global cognition can be achieved in a six-months intervention period. When CCT is combined with digital nutritional counseling, the form of intervention – whether elaborate or basic – apparently did not modify the outcome; rather, this data set suggests that it is worthwhile to proactively undertake something in both domains. Future clinical studies in mixed-methods-designs, including usual-care comparators, basic science study modules, qualitative aspects and health economic variables are warranted to gain a better understanding of mechanisms, sustainability of effects, clinical relevance, and cost-effectiveness. Trial registration ISRCTN10560738; registered 11/23/2021.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s Research & Therapy
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-026-02255-6
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Computerised cognitive training combined with nutritional counseling in mild cognitive impairment - results of a 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial (BrainFit-nutrition study)

Elmar Graessel, Etienne Hanslian, Melanie Dell’Oro, Michael Jeitler et al.
Alzheimer s Research & Therapy
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Computerised cognitive training combined with nutritional counseling in mild cognitive impairment - results of a 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial (BrainFit-nutrition study)

Elmar Graessel, Etienne Hanslian, Melanie Dell’Oro, Michael Jeitler, Christian S. Keßler, Julia-Sophia Scheuermann, Martin Schmitt, Julia Schiele
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Computerized cognitive training (CCT) and nutritional interventions may improve cognitive functioning in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). This study investigated whether a combination of CCT and online nutritional counseling can improve global cognition in individuals with MCI. We also evaluated differences between MCI-specified and active control versions of the interventions. Methods In this 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial (BrainFit-Nutrition study), conducted fully remotely, participants in Germany with a psychometric diagnosis of MCI (age 60+) were randomized into four groups (Intention to treat, n = 270). For each intervention, one MCI specified and one active control version were developed (cognition: individualized CCT (iCCT) vs. basic CCT (bCCT); nutrition: whole-food plant-based nutrition (WFPB) vs. German Nutrition Society (DGE)). At baseline and after six months, cognitive functioning was assessed with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA; primary outcome: change after six months). A mixed-model ANCOVA (t0-t6, complete case strategy (CC), n = 228) was applied for the main analysis. Results All four groups achieved a significant improvement of approximately 2 points on the MoCA after six months. Estimated marginal means varied from M = 2.44 (iCCTxDGE) to M = 1.77 (iCCTxWFPB), notably without significant group differences. The 2 × 2 mixed ANCOVA revealed a significant main effect of time ( F = 3.96, p = 0.048, partial η 2 = 0.018). The specific content of the respective modalities being compared (iCCT vs. bCCT; WFPB vs. DGE-oriented counseling) did not appear to make a relevant group difference with regard to the primary outcome. After 6 months, 55% of all participants reached non-MCI values on the MoCA. Conclusion The results of this study suggest, that in people with MCI, notable improvement in global cognition can be achieved in a six-months intervention period. When CCT is combined with digital nutritional counseling, the form of intervention – whether elaborate or basic – apparently did not modify the outcome; rather, this data set suggests that it is worthwhile to proactively undertake something in both domains. Future clinical studies in mixed-methods-designs, including usual-care comparators, basic science study modules, qualitative aspects and health economic variables are warranted to gain a better understanding of mechanisms, sustainability of effects, clinical relevance, and cost-effectiveness. Trial registration ISRCTN10560738; registered 11/23/2021.

Alzheimer s Research & Therapy
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon