Farm size and tillage technology reveal contrasting modelled patterns in fuel consumption and machinery-related greenhouse gas emissions in Lithuanian crop production

Abstract Fuel use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with mechanised agricultural operations depend on both production technologies and farm characteristics, yet these factors are often analysed separately. This study developed an integrated deterministic modelling framework to evaluate fuel consumption and machinery-related GHG emissions from diesel fuel combustion across five tillage systems—conventional plowing (PL), minimum tillage (MT), deep strip-till (DST), shallow strip-till (SST), and no-till (NT) across multiple crop groups and five farm size groups ranging from 30 to 50 ha to > 500 ha under Lithuanian conditions. Fuel consumption was calculated for all mechanised operations using predefined tractor–implement operating parameters, field performance, coefficients, input requirements, crop yields, and transport distances. Machinery-related GHG emissions were estimated from diesel consumption using IPCC emission factors. Soil-derived emissions and upstream emissions associated with the production of fertilisers, pesticides, fuels, and machinery were outside the system boundary of the present study. The results identified contrasting area- and yield-scaled patterns. Fuel consumption and machinery-related GHG emissions per unit area increased across the predefined farm-size scenarios, partly reflecting the assumed transport distances and machinery configurations, whereas fuel use and machinery-related GHG emissions per unit of production decreased as a result of the predefined yield and operational-efficiency assumptions. Across all farm sizes, NT showed the lowest fuel consumption and machinery-related GHG emissions, while PL consistently produced the highest values. Compared with PL, NT reduced fuel use and associated machinery-related GHG emissions by 35–58%, depending on crop type and farm size. The principal contribution of the study is a harmonized scenario-based comparison of tillage intensity, crop group, farm size, machinery configuration, operational logistics, and machinery-related GHG emissions within a single deterministic framework using both area- and output-scaled indicators. This approach enables the magnitude and consistency of machinery-related fuel and GHG differences to be evaluated across production scenarios under a common set of assumptions. The results demonstrate the importance of reporting both area- and output-scaled indicators when evaluating technological scenarios in crop production.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-79909-w
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Agriculture Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Farm size and tillage technology reveal contrasting modelled patterns in fuel consumption and machinery-related greenhouse gas emissions in Lithuanian crop production

Egidijus Šarauskis, Vilma Naujokienė, Kęstutis Romaneckas, Kristina Lekavičienė
Scientific Reports
Energy, Environment, Agriculture Analysis
article

Farm size and tillage technology reveal contrasting modelled patterns in fuel consumption and machinery-related greenhouse gas emissions in Lithuanian crop production

Egidijus Šarauskis, Vilma Naujokienė, Kęstutis Romaneckas, Kristina Lekavičienė
article en

Abstract

Abstract Fuel use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with mechanised agricultural operations depend on both production technologies and farm characteristics, yet these factors are often analysed separately. This study developed an integrated deterministic modelling framework to evaluate fuel consumption and machinery-related GHG emissions from diesel fuel combustion across five tillage systems—conventional plowing (PL), minimum tillage (MT), deep strip-till (DST), shallow strip-till (SST), and no-till (NT) across multiple crop groups and five farm size groups ranging from 30 to 50 ha to > 500 ha under Lithuanian conditions. Fuel consumption was calculated for all mechanised operations using predefined tractor–implement operating parameters, field performance, coefficients, input requirements, crop yields, and transport distances. Machinery-related GHG emissions were estimated from diesel consumption using IPCC emission factors. Soil-derived emissions and upstream emissions associated with the production of fertilisers, pesticides, fuels, and machinery were outside the system boundary of the present study. The results identified contrasting area- and yield-scaled patterns. Fuel consumption and machinery-related GHG emissions per unit area increased across the predefined farm-size scenarios, partly reflecting the assumed transport distances and machinery configurations, whereas fuel use and machinery-related GHG emissions per unit of production decreased as a result of the predefined yield and operational-efficiency assumptions. Across all farm sizes, NT showed the lowest fuel consumption and machinery-related GHG emissions, while PL consistently produced the highest values. Compared with PL, NT reduced fuel use and associated machinery-related GHG emissions by 35–58%, depending on crop type and farm size. The principal contribution of the study is a harmonized scenario-based comparison of tillage intensity, crop group, farm size, machinery configuration, operational logistics, and machinery-related GHG emissions within a single deterministic framework using both area- and output-scaled indicators. This approach enables the magnitude and consistency of machinery-related fuel and GHG differences to be evaluated across production scenarios under a common set of assumptions. The results demonstrate the importance of reporting both area- and output-scaled indicators when evaluating technological scenarios in crop production.

Scientific Reports
Energy, Environment, Agriculture Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon