Development of a system of indicators and criteria for the qualimetric evaluation of the quality of construction projects

Purpose. The objective of this article is to develop a scientifically grounded system of indicators and criteria for the qualimetric assessment of the quality of construction projects, which ensures a comprehensive consideration of the project’s technical, economic, organizational-technological, and risk-oriented characteristics, as well as to create a methodological foundation for determining an integrated quality indicator and improving the soundness of management decisions at all stages of a construction project’s life cycle. Methodology. The research methodology is based on the application of systemic and qualimetric approaches to assessing the quality of construction projects. The study employs methods of scientific literature analysis, systems analysis, and structural decomposition to form a hierarchical system of quality indicators. The determination of weighting coefficients for the criteria involves the use of the hierarchical analysis method, while the formation of an integrated assessment involves normalizing and aggregating partial indicators into a single quality indicator. Findings. As a result of the study, a system of indicators and criteria for the qualimetric assessment of construction project quality was developed, covering technical, economic, organizational-technological, and risk-oriented characteristics. A hierarchical structure of indicators, an approach to their normalization, and a method for determining weighting coefficients are proposed. The results obtained provide a methodological basis for calculating a comprehensive quality indicator for a construction project and for supporting management decisions in the construction industry. Originality. The scientific novelty of this work lies in the refinement of approaches to the qualimetric assessment of construction project quality through the development of a structured system of indicators that encompasses individual, group, and integrated criteria and ensures a more comprehensive consideration of the multifactorial nature of construction processes. Within the scope of the study, principles for determining weighting coefficients were developed, taking into account the influence of organizational and technological conditions, and the procedure for integrated quality assessment was refined to reflect the interrelationships between key project parameters. This enhances the objectivity and informativeness of the quality assessment of construction solutions. Practical value. The practical significance of this work lies in the possibility of applying the developed system of indicators and criteria for the qualimetric assessment of the quality of construction projects in design and construction organizations. The proposed approach ensures a more well-founded comparison of alternative solutions, improves the accuracy of assessing organizational and technological parameters, and helps reduce the risks of exceeding construction deadlines and costs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bridges and tunnels Theory Research Practice
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15802/bttrp2026-30-06
Primary Topic
Construction Project Management and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Development of a system of indicators and criteria for the qualimetric evaluation of the quality of construction projects

V. M. KOZYRIATSKYI
Bridges and tunnels Theory Research Practice
Construction Project Management and Performance
article

Development of a system of indicators and criteria for the qualimetric evaluation of the quality of construction projects

V. M. KOZYRIATSKYI
article en

Abstract

Purpose. The objective of this article is to develop a scientifically grounded system of indicators and criteria for the qualimetric assessment of the quality of construction projects, which ensures a comprehensive consideration of the project’s technical, economic, organizational-technological, and risk-oriented characteristics, as well as to create a methodological foundation for determining an integrated quality indicator and improving the soundness of management decisions at all stages of a construction project’s life cycle. Methodology. The research methodology is based on the application of systemic and qualimetric approaches to assessing the quality of construction projects. The study employs methods of scientific literature analysis, systems analysis, and structural decomposition to form a hierarchical system of quality indicators. The determination of weighting coefficients for the criteria involves the use of the hierarchical analysis method, while the formation of an integrated assessment involves normalizing and aggregating partial indicators into a single quality indicator. Findings. As a result of the study, a system of indicators and criteria for the qualimetric assessment of construction project quality was developed, covering technical, economic, organizational-technological, and risk-oriented characteristics. A hierarchical structure of indicators, an approach to their normalization, and a method for determining weighting coefficients are proposed. The results obtained provide a methodological basis for calculating a comprehensive quality indicator for a construction project and for supporting management decisions in the construction industry. Originality. The scientific novelty of this work lies in the refinement of approaches to the qualimetric assessment of construction project quality through the development of a structured system of indicators that encompasses individual, group, and integrated criteria and ensures a more comprehensive consideration of the multifactorial nature of construction processes. Within the scope of the study, principles for determining weighting coefficients were developed, taking into account the influence of organizational and technological conditions, and the procedure for integrated quality assessment was refined to reflect the interrelationships between key project parameters. This enhances the objectivity and informativeness of the quality assessment of construction solutions. Practical value. The practical significance of this work lies in the possibility of applying the developed system of indicators and criteria for the qualimetric assessment of the quality of construction projects in design and construction organizations. The proposed approach ensures a more well-founded comparison of alternative solutions, improves the accuracy of assessing organizational and technological parameters, and helps reduce the risks of exceeding construction deadlines and costs.

Bridges and tunnels Theory Research Practice(30)
Zaporizhzhia National University (UA)
Construction Project Management and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon