Coastal Flooding Resilience in Sitio Kagang and Sitio Tapusok of Barangay Utod: Integrating Local Worldviews and Futures Thinking for Adaptive Management

This study examines how sustainability worldviews shape residents' understanding of coastal flooding and their preferred management responses in Sitio Kagang and Sitio Tapusok, Barangay Utod, Baybay City, Philippines. Using a convergent mixed-methods design, we surveyed 99 coastal residents (87.6% of households), conducted 8 focus group discussions with residents using causal mapping, and consulted 9 expert key informants through individual interviews and a focus group discussion with environmental scientists. Survey responses classified 90 residents (90.9%) into three worldview orientations: hybrid (n = 50), primary ecocentric (n = 27), and primary anthropocentric (n = 13). Residents across all groups agreed that poor waste management (M = 4.60), upland deforestation (M = 4.58), and climate change (M = 4.51) drive flooding, with no significant group differences. Groups differed, however, on whether inadequate drainage (p = .014) or mangrove destruction (p = .042) is the primary cause. Support for stronger seawalls (M = 4.58), upstream reforestation (M = 4.41), mangrove restoration (M = 4.37), and combined engineered and ecosystem solutions (M = 4.10) did not differ by worldview. The sharpest divide concerned knowledge: anthropocentric residents rejected the idea that local knowledge is as valuable as scientific knowledge (M = 1.85), while hybrid and ecocentric residents endorsed it (M = 4.06 and 4.30; p < .001). Of three management scenarios, residents rated integrated adaptive management highest (M = 4.56; 89.9% agreeing), consistent with scenario discussions and expert interviews favoring a combination of structural protection, ecosystem restoration, and participatory governance. The findings suggest that worldview diversity need not block agreement on flood measures, but that resilience planning in these communities must also address whose knowledge counts in decision-making.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
SocArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/5cxr8
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Coastal Flooding Resilience in Sitio Kagang and Sitio Tapusok of Barangay Utod: Integrating Local Worldviews and Futures Thinking for Adaptive Management

Jedess Miladel Salomon, Anna Rossini E. Parcero, Ma. Kresna Mansueto, Marloudiza McMillan et al.
SocArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
preprint

Coastal Flooding Resilience in Sitio Kagang and Sitio Tapusok of Barangay Utod: Integrating Local Worldviews and Futures Thinking for Adaptive Management

Jedess Miladel Salomon, Anna Rossini E. Parcero, Ma. Kresna Mansueto, Marloudiza McMillan, Erick Glenn Juanich, Mohaliden Mohammad, Ulysses Nolan Paredes
preprint en

Abstract

This study examines how sustainability worldviews shape residents' understanding of coastal flooding and their preferred management responses in Sitio Kagang and Sitio Tapusok, Barangay Utod, Baybay City, Philippines. Using a convergent mixed-methods design, we surveyed 99 coastal residents (87.6% of households), conducted 8 focus group discussions with residents using causal mapping, and consulted 9 expert key informants through individual interviews and a focus group discussion with environmental scientists. Survey responses classified 90 residents (90.9%) into three worldview orientations: hybrid (n = 50), primary ecocentric (n = 27), and primary anthropocentric (n = 13). Residents across all groups agreed that poor waste management (M = 4.60), upland deforestation (M = 4.58), and climate change (M = 4.51) drive flooding, with no significant group differences. Groups differed, however, on whether inadequate drainage (p = .014) or mangrove destruction (p = .042) is the primary cause. Support for stronger seawalls (M = 4.58), upstream reforestation (M = 4.41), mangrove restoration (M = 4.37), and combined engineered and ecosystem solutions (M = 4.10) did not differ by worldview. The sharpest divide concerned knowledge: anthropocentric residents rejected the idea that local knowledge is as valuable as scientific knowledge (M = 1.85), while hybrid and ecocentric residents endorsed it (M = 4.06 and 4.30; p < .001). Of three management scenarios, residents rated integrated adaptive management highest (M = 4.56; 89.9% agreeing), consistent with scenario discussions and expert interviews favoring a combination of structural protection, ecosystem restoration, and participatory governance. The findings suggest that worldview diversity need not block agreement on flood measures, but that resilience planning in these communities must also address whose knowledge counts in decision-making.

SocArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Coastal Flooding Resilience in Sitio Kagang and Sitio Tapusok of Barangay Utod: Integrating Local Worldviews and Futures Thinking for Adaptive Management — Jedess Miladel Salomon, Anna Rossini E. Parcero, et al. · SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS