Designing for emergence: A bricolage approach to causal inference in systems change

As methodological bricolage is increasingly positioned as a response to complexity in contemporary philanthropic strategies, it is becoming more widely adopted within systems change evaluations. Yet, questions remain about what rigorous application of bricolage looks like and how quality can be assured. This paper contributes to this growing body of knowledge by introducing the concept of an evaluation design trajectory: an intentional progression of inquiry, causal questions and methodological choices, anchored in an evolving theoretical understanding of ‘how change happened’ within a complex system. We situate the concept within the literature on systems change and methodological bricolage, then present a climate adaptation advocacy portfolio evaluation as a worked example of its application in practice. We argue that bricolage can enhance rigour when design choices are intentional, coherent and anchored in evolving causal questions, while highlighting lessons and practical considerations that this approach raises for evaluators and commissioners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Evaluation
Published
2026-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890261491353
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Designing for emergence: A bricolage approach to causal inference in systems change

Nushina Mir, Dheeya Rizmie, Drew Koleros, Margo Berends
Evaluation
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
article

Designing for emergence: A bricolage approach to causal inference in systems change

Nushina Mir, Dheeya Rizmie, Drew Koleros, Margo Berends
article en

Abstract

As methodological bricolage is increasingly positioned as a response to complexity in contemporary philanthropic strategies, it is becoming more widely adopted within systems change evaluations. Yet, questions remain about what rigorous application of bricolage looks like and how quality can be assured. This paper contributes to this growing body of knowledge by introducing the concept of an evaluation design trajectory: an intentional progression of inquiry, causal questions and methodological choices, anchored in an evolving theoretical understanding of ‘how change happened’ within a complex system. We situate the concept within the literature on systems change and methodological bricolage, then present a climate adaptation advocacy portfolio evaluation as a worked example of its application in practice. We argue that bricolage can enhance rigour when design choices are intentional, coherent and anchored in evolving causal questions, while highlighting lessons and practical considerations that this approach raises for evaluators and commissioners.

Evaluation
Gates Foundation (US)
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon