An Agent’s Death: End-of-Life Governance for Agentic AI Systems

Governance of agentic artificial intelligence has concentrated on the beginning and middle of a system’s operational life — how an agent is approved, what it may access, and how its behaviour is monitored while it runs — and has treated the end as a technical afterthought. This article argues that decommissioning an agentic system is not an endpoint but a transition, in which an accountable actor becomes a set of orphaned effects, access paths, and records that require an owner. Existing regimes govern much of an agent’s operating life and address fragments of retirement, but they do not specify an integrated governance approach to residuals that survive operational termination. The article distinguishes the retirement of an agent’s access, which identity and security practice addresses, from three residual problems it does not address: the plan interrupted mid-execution, the effect already propagating, and the decision record that must survive the actor. From this distinction it derives two governing principles — that the conditions for a clean death must be established during the agent’s life, and that the impacts of death must be provisioned for as soon as they are foreseeable while those incurred are remediated and owned. It specifies how these duties should scale with an agent’s discretion and reach, so that the architecture binds, as a condition of deployment, only above a materiality threshold; how they might be allocated across supplier, deployer, and custodian; and how the obligation to preserve an agent’s record can be made to survive (...)

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33774/coe-2026-pp9l8
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

An Agent’s Death: End-of-Life Governance for Agentic AI Systems

Maria Luz Madariaga
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
preprint

An Agent’s Death: End-of-Life Governance for Agentic AI Systems

Maria Luz Madariaga
preprint en

Abstract

Governance of agentic artificial intelligence has concentrated on the beginning and middle of a system’s operational life — how an agent is approved, what it may access, and how its behaviour is monitored while it runs — and has treated the end as a technical afterthought. This article argues that decommissioning an agentic system is not an endpoint but a transition, in which an accountable actor becomes a set of orphaned effects, access paths, and records that require an owner. Existing regimes govern much of an agent’s operating life and address fragments of retirement, but they do not specify an integrated governance approach to residuals that survive operational termination. The article distinguishes the retirement of an agent’s access, which identity and security practice addresses, from three residual problems it does not address: the plan interrupted mid-execution, the effect already propagating, and the decision record that must survive the actor. From this distinction it derives two governing principles — that the conditions for a clean death must be established during the agent’s life, and that the impacts of death must be provisioned for as soon as they are foreseeable while those incurred are remediated and owned. It specifies how these duties should scale with an agent’s discretion and reach, so that the architecture binds, as a condition of deployment, only above a materiality threshold; how they might be allocated across supplier, deployer, and custodian; and how the obligation to preserve an agent’s record can be made to survive (...)

Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon