Lay Conceptions About Critical Thinking: Opportunities or Obstacles for Teaching?

ABSTRACT This article presents the results of a mixed‐method study investigating lay conceptions of critical thinking (CT) among 506 English‐ and French‐speaking participants, with a focus on beliefs relevant to the teaching of CT: its value, its teachability and participants' beliefs about their own CT skills. Our results suggest that CT is widely perceived as important and valuable, and as a skill that can be taught rather than an innate ability. However, most participants, regardless of age, tend to consider themselves more critical than others. This better‐than‐average effect is partly explained by positive beliefs about CT skills and by the idealization of CT. We discuss the implications of these results for the teaching of CT and its potential pitfalls.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Education
Published
2026-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70930
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Lay Conceptions About Critical Thinking: Opportunities or Obstacles for Teaching?

Céline Schöpfer, Florián Cova, Manon Delphine Gouiran, Julia Ghaliounghi
European Journal of Education
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Lay Conceptions About Critical Thinking: Opportunities or Obstacles for Teaching?

Céline Schöpfer, Florián Cova, Manon Delphine Gouiran, Julia Ghaliounghi
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article presents the results of a mixed‐method study investigating lay conceptions of critical thinking (CT) among 506 English‐ and French‐speaking participants, with a focus on beliefs relevant to the teaching of CT: its value, its teachability and participants' beliefs about their own CT skills. Our results suggest that CT is widely perceived as important and valuable, and as a skill that can be taught rather than an innate ability. However, most participants, regardless of age, tend to consider themselves more critical than others. This better‐than‐average effect is partly explained by positive beliefs about CT skills and by the idealization of CT. We discuss the implications of these results for the teaching of CT and its potential pitfalls.

European Journal of EducationVol. 61(4)
University of Geneva (CH)
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Lay Conceptions About Critical Thinking: Opportunities or Obstacles for Teaching? — Céline Schöpfer, Florián Cova, et al. · European Journal of Education (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS