Cross-Scene Transfer Accuracy of Geometric Correction Parameters for GF-3B/C SAR Imagery

Accurate geometric positioning is essential for the quantitative application of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery. Although geometric calibration can effectively reduce systematic positioning errors, the cross-scene transferability of calibration-derived correction parameters remains insufficiently evaluated, particularly under different acquisition conditions. This study investigates the geometric positioning accuracy and parameter transferability of GF-3B/C SAR imagery using observations from the Xilinhot and Lijiang calibration sites. Scene-specific range and azimuth-time corrections were first estimated within the Range–Doppler framework, followed by cross-scene transfer experiments and acquisition-condition sensitivity analyses. The results indicate that scene-specific correction established a high-accuracy baseline, reducing the median planimetric root-mean-square error (RMSE) from 57.50 m to 1.53 m. In cross-scene transfer, the range correction exhibited substantially higher stability than the azimuth-time correction. Range-only transfer yielded a median combined two-dimensional RMSE of 50.98 m, whereas combined transfer yielded 60.51 m, compared with 57.85 m before transfer. Transfer performance was associated with source–target acquisition compatibility, yielding superior accuracy when satellite platform, orbit direction, and Doppler centroid frequency differences were well matched. Furthermore, cross-site transfer demonstrated accuracy comparable to that of same-site transfer under compatible conditions. These findings indicate that parameter transferability depends on both the specific correction component and acquisition compatibility. For GF-3B/C imagery in ground-control-point-free (GCP-free) scenarios, range corrections offer strong potential for direct reuse, whereas azimuth-time corrections require rigorous compatibility screening during source-scene selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18213845
Primary Topic
Satellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Cross-Scene Transfer Accuracy of Geometric Correction Parameters for GF-3B/C SAR Imagery

Jingwen Yuan, Fengli Zhang, Yanan Jiao, Hong Wang et al.
Remote Sensing
Satellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry
article

Cross-Scene Transfer Accuracy of Geometric Correction Parameters for GF-3B/C SAR Imagery

Jingwen Yuan, Fengli Zhang, Yanan Jiao, Hong Wang, Zhiquan Lin, Xiaochen Liu, Jia Zhang
article en

Abstract

Accurate geometric positioning is essential for the quantitative application of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery. Although geometric calibration can effectively reduce systematic positioning errors, the cross-scene transferability of calibration-derived correction parameters remains insufficiently evaluated, particularly under different acquisition conditions. This study investigates the geometric positioning accuracy and parameter transferability of GF-3B/C SAR imagery using observations from the Xilinhot and Lijiang calibration sites. Scene-specific range and azimuth-time corrections were first estimated within the Range–Doppler framework, followed by cross-scene transfer experiments and acquisition-condition sensitivity analyses. The results indicate that scene-specific correction established a high-accuracy baseline, reducing the median planimetric root-mean-square error (RMSE) from 57.50 m to 1.53 m. In cross-scene transfer, the range correction exhibited substantially higher stability than the azimuth-time correction. Range-only transfer yielded a median combined two-dimensional RMSE of 50.98 m, whereas combined transfer yielded 60.51 m, compared with 57.85 m before transfer. Transfer performance was associated with source–target acquisition compatibility, yielding superior accuracy when satellite platform, orbit direction, and Doppler centroid frequency differences were well matched. Furthermore, cross-site transfer demonstrated accuracy comparable to that of same-site transfer under compatible conditions. These findings indicate that parameter transferability depends on both the specific correction component and acquisition compatibility. For GF-3B/C imagery in ground-control-point-free (GCP-free) scenarios, range corrections offer strong potential for direct reuse, whereas azimuth-time corrections require rigorous compatibility screening during source-scene selection.

Remote SensingVol. 18(21)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Aerospace Information Research Institute (CN), China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Satellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon