Towards the End of the Arsacid Kingdom of Armenia: a Different View

Summary The fall of the Arsacid kingdom of Greater Armenia in 428 is usually seen within a whirl of external geopolitical and internal events of the second half of the 4th–beginning of the 5 th centuries. Initially, the kings of the ruling dynasty, the Armenian Arsacids, tried to find the way between the two great powers of the time, the Roman and Sasanian empires on one side, and the Armenian nobility and Armenian Church on the other. Traditionally, the decline of Arsacid power in Armenia was attributed to the growing rivalry between the Arsacids and Sasanians, which also saw the nobility divided into pro-Roman and pro-Sasanian parties. This culminated in the removal of the last Arsacid king from the throne by the pro-Sasanian party. This paper discusses the factors that led to the weakening of royal power in Armenia and offers a different perspective on the history of the Arsacid kingdom during the later period of its existence. The climate and environmental changes, the so-called “Late Roman mega-drought” in particular, that affected the region during a large period of Late Antiquity, at around 350–450, could have played a significant role in decline processes recorded in Armenia for that period in written and archaeological sources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Klio
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/klio-2026-0022
Primary Topic
Classical Antiquity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Towards the End of the Arsacid Kingdom of Armenia: a Different View

Yervand Grekyan
Klio
Classical Antiquity Studies
article

Towards the End of the Arsacid Kingdom of Armenia: a Different View

Yervand Grekyan
article en

Abstract

Summary The fall of the Arsacid kingdom of Greater Armenia in 428 is usually seen within a whirl of external geopolitical and internal events of the second half of the 4th–beginning of the 5 th centuries. Initially, the kings of the ruling dynasty, the Armenian Arsacids, tried to find the way between the two great powers of the time, the Roman and Sasanian empires on one side, and the Armenian nobility and Armenian Church on the other. Traditionally, the decline of Arsacid power in Armenia was attributed to the growing rivalry between the Arsacids and Sasanians, which also saw the nobility divided into pro-Roman and pro-Sasanian parties. This culminated in the removal of the last Arsacid king from the throne by the pro-Sasanian party. This paper discusses the factors that led to the weakening of royal power in Armenia and offers a different perspective on the history of the Arsacid kingdom during the later period of its existence. The climate and environmental changes, the so-called “Late Roman mega-drought” in particular, that affected the region during a large period of Late Antiquity, at around 350–450, could have played a significant role in decline processes recorded in Armenia for that period in written and archaeological sources.

KlioVol. 108(2)
Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography (AM)
Classical Antiquity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon