Production cues and conditional reliance in AI-mediated news: a three-study investigation of audience judgment under information asymmetry

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly integrated into digital news presentation, understanding how audiences interpret AI-related production cues is critical to explaining evaluations of journalistic authority and reliance. Yet existing research has largely focused on transparency and generalized trust, leaving the relationships among production cues, perceived journalistic attributes, cognitive authority, and context-dependent reliance insufficiently understood. To address this gap, we propose a Signal–Attribute–Authority–Conditional Reliance (SAAC) framework and evaluate it across three complementary studies involving Chinese digital-news users: a 2 × 2 randomized experiment manipulating AI-disclosure and human editorial-review cues while holding the underlying AI-produced news stimulus constant ( n = 473); a cross-sectional survey integrating structural modeling, predictive analysis, and necessary condition analysis ( n = 522); and explanatory semi-structured interviews ( n = 29). The experiment showed that production cues influenced several post-exposure evaluations despite identical news content. Survey findings revealed associations linking perceived disclosure quality and human editorial oversight to perceived news quality and accountability, with further associations involving journalistic cognitive authority, conditional reliance, and acceptance intention, although explanatory and predictive performance remained modest. Interviews indicated that participants distinguished technological presentation capability from journalistic source qualification and evaluated reliance in relation to news topics, perceived stakes, editorial involvement, and institutional safeguards. Together, the findings suggest that,within the present study settings, AI-mediated news acceptance is better understood as an I nstitutionally situated and conditionally bounded judgment than as a simple function of transparency or generalized trust.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1899451
Primary Topic
News Media Framing and Political Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Production cues and conditional reliance in AI-mediated news: a three-study investigation of audience judgment under information asymmetry

JiaXin Zou, Bin Wang
Frontiers in Psychology
News Media Framing and Political Communication
article

Production cues and conditional reliance in AI-mediated news: a three-study investigation of audience judgment under information asymmetry

JiaXin Zou, Bin Wang
article en

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly integrated into digital news presentation, understanding how audiences interpret AI-related production cues is critical to explaining evaluations of journalistic authority and reliance. Yet existing research has largely focused on transparency and generalized trust, leaving the relationships among production cues, perceived journalistic attributes, cognitive authority, and context-dependent reliance insufficiently understood. To address this gap, we propose a Signal–Attribute–Authority–Conditional Reliance (SAAC) framework and evaluate it across three complementary studies involving Chinese digital-news users: a 2 × 2 randomized experiment manipulating AI-disclosure and human editorial-review cues while holding the underlying AI-produced news stimulus constant ( n = 473); a cross-sectional survey integrating structural modeling, predictive analysis, and necessary condition analysis ( n = 522); and explanatory semi-structured interviews ( n = 29). The experiment showed that production cues influenced several post-exposure evaluations despite identical news content. Survey findings revealed associations linking perceived disclosure quality and human editorial oversight to perceived news quality and accountability, with further associations involving journalistic cognitive authority, conditional reliance, and acceptance intention, although explanatory and predictive performance remained modest. Interviews indicated that participants distinguished technological presentation capability from journalistic source qualification and evaluated reliance in relation to news topics, perceived stakes, editorial involvement, and institutional safeguards. Together, the findings suggest that,within the present study settings, AI-mediated news acceptance is better understood as an I nstitutionally situated and conditionally bounded judgment than as a simple function of transparency or generalized trust.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 17
Hanyang University (KR)
News Media Framing and Political Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Production cues and conditional reliance in AI-mediated news: a three-study investigation of audience judgment under information asymmetry — JiaXin Zou, Bin Wang · Frontiers in Psychology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS