Comparing Patient-Reported Discomfort and Anxiety With Health Care Professional Assessments During Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Results of a Multicenter Study

Discomfort and anxiety are key factors during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE), impacting patient experience and safety. However, health care professionals often misjudge these levels, which can affect the procedure's outcome. This study aimed to compare patient-reported discomfort and anxiety during UGIE with health care professionals' assessments. A total of 229 patient-endoscopic assistant-endoscopist triads were enrolled in the study. Discomfort and anxiety were measured on an 11-point numerical rating scale. Patients rated their expected level of discomfort at 5.5 (95% confidence interval: 5.2-5.8) and their recalled discomfort at 4.9 (95% confidence interval: 4.5-5.3). Gender differences were observed in expected discomfort levels, but not in recalled discomfort. The mean anxiety score before UGIE was 4.2 (SD 3.0). Patients generally rated their discomfort during UGIE and anxiety before the procedure higher than health care professionals did, with significant interindividual variation. Despite this, the majority of patients (n = 202, 88.2%) were willing to undergo UGIE again. The study revealed significant discrepancies between patient and professional assessments of discomfort and anxiety, likely due to individual variability. Delivering person-centered care during UGIE requires advanced skills to address these differences, emphasizing the need for ongoing skill development in clinicians.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gastroenterology Nursing
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/sga.0000000000000975
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Comparing Patient-Reported Discomfort and Anxiety With Health Care Professional Assessments During Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Results of a Multicenter Study

Lone Dragnes Brix, Kirsten Kallestrup, Birgitte Vestenaa
Gastroenterology Nursing
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Comparing Patient-Reported Discomfort and Anxiety With Health Care Professional Assessments During Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Results of a Multicenter Study

Lone Dragnes Brix, Kirsten Kallestrup, Birgitte Vestenaa
article en

Abstract

Discomfort and anxiety are key factors during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE), impacting patient experience and safety. However, health care professionals often misjudge these levels, which can affect the procedure's outcome. This study aimed to compare patient-reported discomfort and anxiety during UGIE with health care professionals' assessments. A total of 229 patient-endoscopic assistant-endoscopist triads were enrolled in the study. Discomfort and anxiety were measured on an 11-point numerical rating scale. Patients rated their expected level of discomfort at 5.5 (95% confidence interval: 5.2-5.8) and their recalled discomfort at 4.9 (95% confidence interval: 4.5-5.3). Gender differences were observed in expected discomfort levels, but not in recalled discomfort. The mean anxiety score before UGIE was 4.2 (SD 3.0). Patients generally rated their discomfort during UGIE and anxiety before the procedure higher than health care professionals did, with significant interindividual variation. Despite this, the majority of patients (n = 202, 88.2%) were willing to undergo UGIE again. The study revealed significant discrepancies between patient and professional assessments of discomfort and anxiety, likely due to individual variability. Delivering person-centered care during UGIE requires advanced skills to address these differences, emphasizing the need for ongoing skill development in clinicians.

Gastroenterology Nursing
Aarhus University (DK), Regional Hospital Horsens (DK), Regionshospitalet Herning (DK)
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon