Residual Mechanical Performance and Mass Loss of Heat-Cured NaOH-Activated Fly Ash/Slag and Portland Cement Mortars After Exposure to Elevated Temperatures

This study compares the residual mechanical performance and mass loss of NaOH-activated Fly Ash (FA), Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS) and FA/GGBFS mortars with those of CEM I 42.5R and CEM I 52.5R mortars after exposure to 300, 600 and 900 °C. The alkali-activated mortars were heat-cured at 100 °C for 3 days, whereas the Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) mortars were water-cured for 28 days, to compare the residual performance of the materials produced under their respective curing regimes. After 900 °C, the GGBFS mortar retained 43.4 MPa in compression (57.5%) and 2.88 MPa in flexure (44.9%), against 6.4–9.1 MPa (11.7–14.6%) and 1.29–1.40 MPa (12.8–16.3%) for the OPC mortars, both differences being statistically significant for each OPC mortar. The FA/GGBFS mortar (33.9 MPa, 50.9% in compression) exceeded the OPC mortars only in mean value; the differences were not statistically significant. GGBFS showed the highest mass loss (7.83% at 900 °C). In a correlation analysis, mass loss mirrored strength loss in the OPC mortars (R2 = 0.92–0.98) but not in the alkali-activated ones (R2 ≤ 0.11), showing that mass loss alone was not a consistent indicator of thermal damage across binder systems. The results indicate that the GGBFS-based NaOH-activated mortar is a promising alternative to OPC for precast building elements that must retain residual load-bearing capacity after high-temperature exposure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16214469
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Residual Mechanical Performance and Mass Loss of Heat-Cured NaOH-Activated Fly Ash/Slag and Portland Cement Mortars After Exposure to Elevated Temperatures

Cengiz Duran Atiş, Marco Corradi, Erion Luga, Enea Mustafaraj et al.
Buildings
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
article

Residual Mechanical Performance and Mass Loss of Heat-Cured NaOH-Activated Fly Ash/Slag and Portland Cement Mortars After Exposure to Elevated Temperatures

Cengiz Duran Atiş, Marco Corradi, Erion Luga, Enea Mustafaraj, Ela Görür Avşaroğlu
article en

Abstract

This study compares the residual mechanical performance and mass loss of NaOH-activated Fly Ash (FA), Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS) and FA/GGBFS mortars with those of CEM I 42.5R and CEM I 52.5R mortars after exposure to 300, 600 and 900 °C. The alkali-activated mortars were heat-cured at 100 °C for 3 days, whereas the Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) mortars were water-cured for 28 days, to compare the residual performance of the materials produced under their respective curing regimes. After 900 °C, the GGBFS mortar retained 43.4 MPa in compression (57.5%) and 2.88 MPa in flexure (44.9%), against 6.4–9.1 MPa (11.7–14.6%) and 1.29–1.40 MPa (12.8–16.3%) for the OPC mortars, both differences being statistically significant for each OPC mortar. The FA/GGBFS mortar (33.9 MPa, 50.9% in compression) exceeded the OPC mortars only in mean value; the differences were not statistically significant. GGBFS showed the highest mass loss (7.83% at 900 °C). In a correlation analysis, mass loss mirrored strength loss in the OPC mortars (R2 = 0.92–0.98) but not in the alkali-activated ones (R2 ≤ 0.11), showing that mass loss alone was not a consistent indicator of thermal damage across binder systems. The results indicate that the GGBFS-based NaOH-activated mortar is a promising alternative to OPC for precast building elements that must retain residual load-bearing capacity after high-temperature exposure.

BuildingsVol. 16(21)
University of Huddersfield (GB), American University of the Middle East (KW), Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University (TR), Erciyes University (TR)
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon