Who Gets Care, When, and How: Responsibility Articulation in Platform-Mediated Health Communication

Across the United States, communities are shifting from fragmented care to local care networks (LCNs), which are interorganizational networks of health and human services (e.g., Community Care Hubs, Systems of Care) that use community referral platforms (CRPs), digital systems that connect organizations for service delivery. Fragmentation occurs when a client or patient's care is delivered across multiple uncoordinated providers and facilities. As CRPs evolve and services digitize, understanding their impact on responsibility sharing becomes crucial. This study employs articulation work theory to analyze how workers coordinate and negotiate roles within LCNs. It draws on 13 interviews with frontline workers in Chicago who utilize CRPs to investigate the impact of CRP use on health communication tasks within networked care. Using an abductive approach, the findings reveal that typical types of articulation work, namely task, relational, emotional, infrastructural, and temporal, are present in LCNs. Most notably, this study introduces responsibility articulation, a sociotechnical and communicative process through which frontline workers and digital referral platforms shape how care is communicated, coordinated, and made accessible to communities. Through this process, information about clients' needs is translated into system-recognizable cases that can be accepted, delayed, redirected, or rejected. In turn, responsibility for care is assigned, negotiated, limited, or refused across workers, organizations, and technologies. These findings demonstrate that CRPs do more than support coordination between institutions. They also influence health communication about access, eligibility, and response, with important implications for serving vulnerable populations in healthcare and community settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Communication
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2026.2761598
Primary Topic
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Who Gets Care, When, and How: Responsibility Articulation in Platform-Mediated Health Communication

Joshua–Paul Miles
Health Communication
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
article

Who Gets Care, When, and How: Responsibility Articulation in Platform-Mediated Health Communication

Joshua–Paul Miles
article en

Abstract

Across the United States, communities are shifting from fragmented care to local care networks (LCNs), which are interorganizational networks of health and human services (e.g., Community Care Hubs, Systems of Care) that use community referral platforms (CRPs), digital systems that connect organizations for service delivery. Fragmentation occurs when a client or patient's care is delivered across multiple uncoordinated providers and facilities. As CRPs evolve and services digitize, understanding their impact on responsibility sharing becomes crucial. This study employs articulation work theory to analyze how workers coordinate and negotiate roles within LCNs. It draws on 13 interviews with frontline workers in Chicago who utilize CRPs to investigate the impact of CRP use on health communication tasks within networked care. Using an abductive approach, the findings reveal that typical types of articulation work, namely task, relational, emotional, infrastructural, and temporal, are present in LCNs. Most notably, this study introduces responsibility articulation, a sociotechnical and communicative process through which frontline workers and digital referral platforms shape how care is communicated, coordinated, and made accessible to communities. Through this process, information about clients' needs is translated into system-recognizable cases that can be accepted, delayed, redirected, or rejected. In turn, responsibility for care is assigned, negotiated, limited, or refused across workers, organizations, and technologies. These findings demonstrate that CRPs do more than support coordination between institutions. They also influence health communication about access, eligibility, and response, with important implications for serving vulnerable populations in healthcare and community settings.

Health Communication
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon