Is there a female advantage in first- and second-instance decisions on asylum applications in the European Union?

This article examines the context-dependent nature of gender differences in asylum recognition across the EU27 between 2008 and 2024, drawing on Eurostat data on more than eight million decisions concerning adult applicants. We compare women’s and men’s probabilities of receiving a positive decision and, conditional on success, being granted refugee status rather than subsidiary or humanitarian protection. Women generally have higher predicted probabilities of receiving a positive decision at both first and final instance, although the size and direction of the gender gap vary across destination countries. This advantage does not consistently extend to refugee status. The female advantage in overall recognition is greater when women account for a smaller share of decisions concerning applicants from the same country of origin in the same destination country and year. Evidence for 2015 also suggests a greater female advantage in countries with more gender-sensitive asylum frameworks. Among successful applicants, the gender gap in refugee status shifts towards women as gender inequality in their countries of origin rises, whereas the female advantage is narrower among applicants from less democratic countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
Published
2026-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2026.2754603
Primary Topic
Gender and Women's Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Is there a female advantage in first- and second-instance decisions on asylum applications in the European Union?

Francesca Tosi, Livia Elisa Ortensi
Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
Gender and Women's Rights
article

Is there a female advantage in first- and second-instance decisions on asylum applications in the European Union?

Francesca Tosi, Livia Elisa Ortensi
article en

Abstract

This article examines the context-dependent nature of gender differences in asylum recognition across the EU27 between 2008 and 2024, drawing on Eurostat data on more than eight million decisions concerning adult applicants. We compare women’s and men’s probabilities of receiving a positive decision and, conditional on success, being granted refugee status rather than subsidiary or humanitarian protection. Women generally have higher predicted probabilities of receiving a positive decision at both first and final instance, although the size and direction of the gender gap vary across destination countries. This advantage does not consistently extend to refugee status. The female advantage in overall recognition is greater when women account for a smaller share of decisions concerning applicants from the same country of origin in the same destination country and year. Evidence for 2015 also suggests a greater female advantage in countries with more gender-sensitive asylum frameworks. Among successful applicants, the gender gap in refugee status shifts towards women as gender inequality in their countries of origin rises, whereas the female advantage is narrower among applicants from less democratic countries.

Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
University of Bologna (IT)
Gender and Women's Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon