Developing and validating a competency framework for learning experience designers: An exploratory sequential mixed‐methods study

Abstract Learning Experience Design (LXD) has emerged as an interdisciplinary field integrating learning sciences, instructional design, user experience design and digital technologies to create meaningful and effective learning experiences. However, the profession lacks an empirically validated competency framework that clearly defines the knowledge, skills, abilities and professional attributes required of Learning Experience Designers (LXDs). This gap creates challenges for organizations in defining professional roles, recruiting and evaluating practitioners, planning professional development and aligning educational programs with workplace expectations. This study aimed to define and validate a competency framework for LX designers using an exploratory sequential mixed‐methods design. The findings revealed that the competency framework consisted of 3 competencies, 14 sub‐competencies and 53 behavioural indicators. Exploratory factor analysis showed that the component variables had significant relationships and a well‐structured framework (KMO = 0.73). Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the model demonstrated a good fit with the empirical data (χ 2 = 55.69, df = 45, p = 0.13, CFI = 1.00, GFI = 0.98, AGFI = 0.96, SRMR = 0.03, RMSEA = 0.022, CN = 637.97). Knowledge competency showed the highest factor loading (β = 0.82), followed by skills and abilities (β = 0.56) and attributes and soft skills (β = 0.29).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Education
Published
2026-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.70256
Primary Topic
Competency Development and Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Developing and validating a competency framework for learning experience designers: An exploratory sequential mixed‐methods study

Sutithep Siripipattanakul, Boonrat Plangsorn, Warakon Phommanee
Review of Education
Competency Development and Evaluation
article

Developing and validating a competency framework for learning experience designers: An exploratory sequential mixed‐methods study

Sutithep Siripipattanakul, Boonrat Plangsorn, Warakon Phommanee
article en

Abstract

Abstract Learning Experience Design (LXD) has emerged as an interdisciplinary field integrating learning sciences, instructional design, user experience design and digital technologies to create meaningful and effective learning experiences. However, the profession lacks an empirically validated competency framework that clearly defines the knowledge, skills, abilities and professional attributes required of Learning Experience Designers (LXDs). This gap creates challenges for organizations in defining professional roles, recruiting and evaluating practitioners, planning professional development and aligning educational programs with workplace expectations. This study aimed to define and validate a competency framework for LX designers using an exploratory sequential mixed‐methods design. The findings revealed that the competency framework consisted of 3 competencies, 14 sub‐competencies and 53 behavioural indicators. Exploratory factor analysis showed that the component variables had significant relationships and a well‐structured framework (KMO = 0.73). Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the model demonstrated a good fit with the empirical data (χ 2 = 55.69, df = 45, p = 0.13, CFI = 1.00, GFI = 0.98, AGFI = 0.96, SRMR = 0.03, RMSEA = 0.022, CN = 637.97). Knowledge competency showed the highest factor loading (β = 0.82), followed by skills and abilities (β = 0.56) and attributes and soft skills (β = 0.29).

Review of EducationVol. 14(3)
Kasetsart University (TH), Institute of Community Colleges (TH), Ranong Community College (TH)
Competency Development and Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon