Diabetes Type and Perinatal Adverse Outcomes Among Women in Pregnancy and Neonates in Japan: A Cohort Study Using a Large‐Scale Database

ABSTRACT Aims To compare maternal and neonatal outcomes across gestational diabetes, preexisting diabetes, overt diabetes in pregnancy and normoglycaemia in Japan. Materials and Methods Using the JMDC claims database, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of mother–neonate pairs from 2015 to 2024. Maternal glycaemic status was classified as normoglycaemia, gestational diabetes, preexisting diabetes or overt diabetes in pregnancy using diagnoses, prescriptions, procedures and timing. Multivariable logistic regression estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for maternal pre‐eclampsia/eclampsia and severe neonatal complications (neonatal death, foetal distress or neonatal intensive care unit admission). Results Among 244 402 neonates from 205 594 mothers, gestational diabetes, preexisting diabetes and overt diabetes were identified in 20 116 (8.2%), 3287 (1.3%) and 901 (0.4%), respectively. Compared with normoglycaemia, gestational diabetes, preexisting diabetes and overt diabetes were associated with higher risks of maternal pre‐eclampsia/eclampsia, with aORs of 1.34 (95% CI: 1.21–1.48), 1.96 (1.64–2.33) and 1.89 (1.35–2.64), respectively. Corresponding aORs for severe neonatal complications were 1.45 (1.38–1.52), 1.95 (1.77–2.15) and 2.55 (2.14–3.03), respectively. Compared directly with preexisting diabetes, overt diabetes was associated with higher odds of severe neonatal complications (aOR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.07–1.59), with no statistically significant difference detected in maternal pre‐eclampsia/eclampsia (aOR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.67–1.40). Conclusions Maternal and neonatal risks varied by hyperglycaemic status. Overt diabetes was associated with a higher risk of severe neonatal complications than preexisting diabetes, with no statistically significant difference detected in maternal pre‐eclampsia/eclampsia. Further validation using longitudinal data around pregnancy is warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.71532
Primary Topic
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Diabetes Type and Perinatal Adverse Outcomes Among Women in Pregnancy and Neonates in Japan: A Cohort Study Using a Large‐Scale Database

Satoko Yamaguchi, Akira Okada, Toshimasa Yamauchi, Yohei Hashimoto et al.
Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
article

Diabetes Type and Perinatal Adverse Outcomes Among Women in Pregnancy and Neonates in Japan: A Cohort Study Using a Large‐Scale Database

Satoko Yamaguchi, Akira Okada, Toshimasa Yamauchi, Yohei Hashimoto, Takashi Kadowaki, Tomoya Kawaguchi, Tomohisa Aoyama, Sachiko Ono, Reiko Inoue, Takashi Sugiyama
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aims To compare maternal and neonatal outcomes across gestational diabetes, preexisting diabetes, overt diabetes in pregnancy and normoglycaemia in Japan. Materials and Methods Using the JMDC claims database, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of mother–neonate pairs from 2015 to 2024. Maternal glycaemic status was classified as normoglycaemia, gestational diabetes, preexisting diabetes or overt diabetes in pregnancy using diagnoses, prescriptions, procedures and timing. Multivariable logistic regression estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for maternal pre‐eclampsia/eclampsia and severe neonatal complications (neonatal death, foetal distress or neonatal intensive care unit admission). Results Among 244 402 neonates from 205 594 mothers, gestational diabetes, preexisting diabetes and overt diabetes were identified in 20 116 (8.2%), 3287 (1.3%) and 901 (0.4%), respectively. Compared with normoglycaemia, gestational diabetes, preexisting diabetes and overt diabetes were associated with higher risks of maternal pre‐eclampsia/eclampsia, with aORs of 1.34 (95% CI: 1.21–1.48), 1.96 (1.64–2.33) and 1.89 (1.35–2.64), respectively. Corresponding aORs for severe neonatal complications were 1.45 (1.38–1.52), 1.95 (1.77–2.15) and 2.55 (2.14–3.03), respectively. Compared directly with preexisting diabetes, overt diabetes was associated with higher odds of severe neonatal complications (aOR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.07–1.59), with no statistically significant difference detected in maternal pre‐eclampsia/eclampsia (aOR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.67–1.40). Conclusions Maternal and neonatal risks varied by hyperglycaemic status. Overt diabetes was associated with a higher risk of severe neonatal complications than preexisting diabetes, with no statistically significant difference detected in maternal pre‐eclampsia/eclampsia. Further validation using longitudinal data around pregnancy is warranted.

Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Kansai Medical University (JP), The University of Sydney (AU), Toranomon Hospital (JP), The University of Tokyo (JP)
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon