Synergistic Stabilization of Aeolian Sand Using Phosphogypsum-Based Materials: Mechanical Performance and Microstructural Evolution

Large-scale desert ecological restoration is constrained by three coupled problems: aeolian sand aggregates poorly and cannot sustain vegetation; stockpiled phosphogypsum imposes a persistent environmental burden; and importing and ameliorating exogenous topsoil is costly. This study evaluated wet-ground modified phosphogypsum (PG-A), as-received phosphogypsum used as aggregate (PG-B), aeolian sand (AS), and phosphogypsum-based supersulfated cement (PPSC). The liquid–plastic limit, compaction, direct-shear, unconfined compressive strength (UCS), and leaching tests were performed. The plasticity index of the PG-B-AS mixtures ranged from 6.62 to 12.31, and the maximum dry density increased with the AS fraction and with the PPSC content under the tested conditions. For PG-B:AS mass ratios from 1:3 to 3:1, the leachate pH ranged from 6.79 to 7.79. When AS constituted at least 25% of the aggregate, soluble phosphorus met the Class V limit of GB 3838-2002, fluoride met the Class I limit, and the phosphorus stabilization efficiency exceeded 93.5%, reaching 96.9% for GL-16 (PG-B:AS = 25:75, 15% PPSC). Room-temperature 14- and 28-day UCS values ranged from 0.602 to 1.950 MPa and from 0.853 to 2.250 MPa, respectively. The mechanical performance improved with a higher PG-B fraction, whereas the environmental fixation improved in the opposite direction. The XRD and SEM revealed quartz, gypsum, ettringite, and C-S-H development during curing. Within the tested range, PG-B:AS = 25:75 with 12–15% PPSC provided the clearest balance between leachate compliance and retained mechanical improvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app162111076
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Synergistic Stabilization of Aeolian Sand Using Phosphogypsum-Based Materials: Mechanical Performance and Microstructural Evolution

贾瑞华, Heyu Wang, Fang Xu, Changwei Zhang et al.
Applied Sciences
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
article

Synergistic Stabilization of Aeolian Sand Using Phosphogypsum-Based Materials: Mechanical Performance and Microstructural Evolution

贾瑞华, Heyu Wang, Fang Xu, Changwei Zhang, Junfeng Hu, Zeyi Bie, Rui Li
article en

Abstract

Large-scale desert ecological restoration is constrained by three coupled problems: aeolian sand aggregates poorly and cannot sustain vegetation; stockpiled phosphogypsum imposes a persistent environmental burden; and importing and ameliorating exogenous topsoil is costly. This study evaluated wet-ground modified phosphogypsum (PG-A), as-received phosphogypsum used as aggregate (PG-B), aeolian sand (AS), and phosphogypsum-based supersulfated cement (PPSC). The liquid–plastic limit, compaction, direct-shear, unconfined compressive strength (UCS), and leaching tests were performed. The plasticity index of the PG-B-AS mixtures ranged from 6.62 to 12.31, and the maximum dry density increased with the AS fraction and with the PPSC content under the tested conditions. For PG-B:AS mass ratios from 1:3 to 3:1, the leachate pH ranged from 6.79 to 7.79. When AS constituted at least 25% of the aggregate, soluble phosphorus met the Class V limit of GB 3838-2002, fluoride met the Class I limit, and the phosphorus stabilization efficiency exceeded 93.5%, reaching 96.9% for GL-16 (PG-B:AS = 25:75, 15% PPSC). Room-temperature 14- and 28-day UCS values ranged from 0.602 to 1.950 MPa and from 0.853 to 2.250 MPa, respectively. The mechanical performance improved with a higher PG-B fraction, whereas the environmental fixation improved in the opposite direction. The XRD and SEM revealed quartz, gypsum, ettringite, and C-S-H development during curing. Within the tested range, PG-B:AS = 25:75 with 12–15% PPSC provided the clearest balance between leachate compliance and retained mechanical improvement.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(21)
Fudan University (CN), China University of Geosciences (CN)
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon