Beyond competencies: a CBT-informed approach to leadership development in the public sector

Purpose This paper examines a developmental gap in competency-led public-sector leadership: leaders may know expected behaviours yet find them less accessible under pressure. It considers a cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)-informed response centred on interpretation, regulation and behavioural choice. Design/methodology/approach This conceptual Viewpoint synthesises selected scholarship on public leadership and competencies, leadership cognition, emotion regulation, reflexivity and coaching psychology. These literatures are integrated with practice-informed reflection to develop Reframe. Regulate. Lead. as one structured response to the competency-access problem. Findings Cognition, appraisal and affect are established influences on leadership behaviour, but their implications are not always integrated into practitioner-facing public-sector development. Leadership development should therefore address interpretation, regulation and purposeful behavioural choice alongside observable competence. Research limitations/implications The framework is conceptual and has not been empirically validated. Future research should test its mechanisms, feasibility, contextual and cultural applicability and comparative value alongside other coaching and reflective-development approaches. Practical implications Reframe. Regulate. Lead. may support self-reflection, executive coaching, reflective supervision and post-incident review, with appropriate facilitator competence and clear boundaries from clinical treatment. Social implications If empirically supported, more reflective and proportionate leadership may contribute to conditions associated with psychological safety, fairness, learning and institutional trust. Originality/value The paper does not claim cognition or emotion as new to leadership research. Its contribution is an integrative, practitioner-oriented public-sector framework that operationalises how established competencies may become less accessible under pressure.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Public Leadership
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpl-07-2026-0156
Primary Topic
Competency Development and Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Beyond competencies: a CBT-informed approach to leadership development in the public sector

Richard Hugh Wildman
International Journal of Public Leadership
Competency Development and Evaluation
article

Beyond competencies: a CBT-informed approach to leadership development in the public sector

Richard Hugh Wildman
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper examines a developmental gap in competency-led public-sector leadership: leaders may know expected behaviours yet find them less accessible under pressure. It considers a cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)-informed response centred on interpretation, regulation and behavioural choice. Design/methodology/approach This conceptual Viewpoint synthesises selected scholarship on public leadership and competencies, leadership cognition, emotion regulation, reflexivity and coaching psychology. These literatures are integrated with practice-informed reflection to develop Reframe. Regulate. Lead. as one structured response to the competency-access problem. Findings Cognition, appraisal and affect are established influences on leadership behaviour, but their implications are not always integrated into practitioner-facing public-sector development. Leadership development should therefore address interpretation, regulation and purposeful behavioural choice alongside observable competence. Research limitations/implications The framework is conceptual and has not been empirically validated. Future research should test its mechanisms, feasibility, contextual and cultural applicability and comparative value alongside other coaching and reflective-development approaches. Practical implications Reframe. Regulate. Lead. may support self-reflection, executive coaching, reflective supervision and post-incident review, with appropriate facilitator competence and clear boundaries from clinical treatment. Social implications If empirically supported, more reflective and proportionate leadership may contribute to conditions associated with psychological safety, fairness, learning and institutional trust. Originality/value The paper does not claim cognition or emotion as new to leadership research. Its contribution is an integrative, practitioner-oriented public-sector framework that operationalises how established competencies may become less accessible under pressure.

International Journal of Public Leadership
Competency Development and Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon