Sim-SEA: Integrating Significant Event Audit and In Situ Simulation to Support Patient Safety Learning and Organizational Change—A Prospective Single-Center Pilot Study in Pediatric Emergency Care

Background/Objectives: Patient safety depends on healthcare systems’ ability to learn from clinical experience and translate insights into system-level improvement. Significant Event Audit (SEA) is well established but may only partly capture the dynamic, context-dependent nature of clinical performance. Although in situ simulation is increasingly used to explore team performance and system vulnerabilities, its routine integration into formal risk-management pathways remains limited. We developed Sim-SEA, a structured approach embedding in situ simulation within the SEA learning cycle. Methods: Sim-SEA adapted the seven-phase SEA framework to incorporate in situ simulation as a core component. We conducted a 12-month single-center, uncontrolled pre–post pilot study in a tertiary pediatric emergency department, comprising 10 Sim-SEA cycles. Self-perceived competence in technical and non-technical domains was assessed at baseline and immediately after simulation using a 6-item ad hoc questionnaire. A follow-up assessment was conducted among participants who subsequently encountered a real emergency. Participants’ perceptions, system vulnerabilities, and improvement actions were also examined. Results: Fifty-nine physicians, residents, and nurses participated. Self-perceived competence improved significantly from baseline to post-simulation across ABCDE assessment, teamwork, situational awareness, communication, speak-up behavior, and decision-making (all p < 0.01). At follow-up, available for 35/59 participants (59.3%) who subsequently encountered a real emergency, self-perceived scores remained significantly higher than baseline. Implemented changes included workspace reorganization, a cognitive medication aid, and a standard operating procedure for role allocation. Participants reported greater engagement, reflective learning, psychological safety, and awareness of risks and system vulnerabilities. Conclusions: In this single-center, uncontrolled pilot study, Sim-SEA was feasible as a structured method for embedding in situ simulation within clinical risk management and supported potential benefits for self-perceived learning and the identification and development of organizational and environmental improvement actions. Further studies should assess effects on objective competence and patient-safety outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14213810
Primary Topic
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Sim-SEA: Integrating Significant Event Audit and In Situ Simulation to Support Patient Safety Learning and Organizational Change—A Prospective Single-Center Pilot Study in Pediatric Emergency Care

Francesca Moretti, Stefano Tardivo, Davide Silvagni, Silvia Poli et al.
Healthcare
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
article

Sim-SEA: Integrating Significant Event Audit and In Situ Simulation to Support Patient Safety Learning and Organizational Change—A Prospective Single-Center Pilot Study in Pediatric Emergency Care

Francesca Moretti, Stefano Tardivo, Davide Silvagni, Silvia Poli, Simona Spada, Roberto Benoni, Pier Luigi Ingrassia, Francesco Corazza, Pierantonio Santuz, Vittoria Berveglieri
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Patient safety depends on healthcare systems’ ability to learn from clinical experience and translate insights into system-level improvement. Significant Event Audit (SEA) is well established but may only partly capture the dynamic, context-dependent nature of clinical performance. Although in situ simulation is increasingly used to explore team performance and system vulnerabilities, its routine integration into formal risk-management pathways remains limited. We developed Sim-SEA, a structured approach embedding in situ simulation within the SEA learning cycle. Methods: Sim-SEA adapted the seven-phase SEA framework to incorporate in situ simulation as a core component. We conducted a 12-month single-center, uncontrolled pre–post pilot study in a tertiary pediatric emergency department, comprising 10 Sim-SEA cycles. Self-perceived competence in technical and non-technical domains was assessed at baseline and immediately after simulation using a 6-item ad hoc questionnaire. A follow-up assessment was conducted among participants who subsequently encountered a real emergency. Participants’ perceptions, system vulnerabilities, and improvement actions were also examined. Results: Fifty-nine physicians, residents, and nurses participated. Self-perceived competence improved significantly from baseline to post-simulation across ABCDE assessment, teamwork, situational awareness, communication, speak-up behavior, and decision-making (all p < 0.01). At follow-up, available for 35/59 participants (59.3%) who subsequently encountered a real emergency, self-perceived scores remained significantly higher than baseline. Implemented changes included workspace reorganization, a cognitive medication aid, and a standard operating procedure for role allocation. Participants reported greater engagement, reflective learning, psychological safety, and awareness of risks and system vulnerabilities. Conclusions: In this single-center, uncontrolled pilot study, Sim-SEA was feasible as a structured method for embedding in situ simulation within clinical risk management and supported potential benefits for self-perceived learning and the identification and development of organizational and environmental improvement actions. Further studies should assess effects on objective competence and patient-safety outcomes.

HealthcareVol. 14(21)
University of Verona (IT), Istituto Superiore di Sanità (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona (IT)
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon