Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Resection: Current Evidence, Surgical Applications, and a Framework for Clinical Translation

Introduction: Pancreatic resection remains technically demanding, with clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) a major source of morbidity. Artificial intelligence (AI) may support risk stratification, operative planning, intraoperative assessment, and postoperative decision support. This focused narrative review evaluates current AI applications in pancreatic resection and their translational maturity. Methods: A structured PubMed/MEDLINE search with an evidence cutoff of 24 July 2026 was supplemented by backward and forward citation tracking. Seventy eligible primary reports were synthesised by clinical task, information timing, and validation maturity. Results: Evidence is dominated by CR-POPF prediction after pancreatoduodenectomy, with additional studies in distal pancreatectomy, other perioperative outcomes, tissue and margin assessment, three-dimensional anatomical planning, and intraoperative video and anatomy recognition. Performance varied with patient selection, predictor timing, data modality, and validation strategy. External validation often changed reported discrimination, while calibration and clinical utility were inconsistently reported. Most studies were retrospective or technical; overlapping cohorts limited independence, and no included study demonstrated improved patient-centred outcomes. Conclusions: AI in pancreatic resection is expanding across prediction, planning, and guidance, but technical performance should not be equated with clinical readiness. Independent validation, prospective workflow and human-factors evaluation, and clinical-impact studies are needed. AI should augment, rather than replace, specialist surgical judgement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15218737
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Resection: Current Evidence, Surgical Applications, and a Framework for Clinical Translation

Ambareen Kausar, Karim Heiba
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Resection: Current Evidence, Surgical Applications, and a Framework for Clinical Translation

Ambareen Kausar, Karim Heiba
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Pancreatic resection remains technically demanding, with clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) a major source of morbidity. Artificial intelligence (AI) may support risk stratification, operative planning, intraoperative assessment, and postoperative decision support. This focused narrative review evaluates current AI applications in pancreatic resection and their translational maturity. Methods: A structured PubMed/MEDLINE search with an evidence cutoff of 24 July 2026 was supplemented by backward and forward citation tracking. Seventy eligible primary reports were synthesised by clinical task, information timing, and validation maturity. Results: Evidence is dominated by CR-POPF prediction after pancreatoduodenectomy, with additional studies in distal pancreatectomy, other perioperative outcomes, tissue and margin assessment, three-dimensional anatomical planning, and intraoperative video and anatomy recognition. Performance varied with patient selection, predictor timing, data modality, and validation strategy. External validation often changed reported discrimination, while calibration and clinical utility were inconsistently reported. Most studies were retrospective or technical; overlapping cohorts limited independence, and no included study demonstrated improved patient-centred outcomes. Conclusions: AI in pancreatic resection is expanding across prediction, planning, and guidance, but technical performance should not be equated with clinical readiness. Independent validation, prospective workflow and human-factors evaluation, and clinical-impact studies are needed. AI should augment, rather than replace, specialist surgical judgement.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(21)
Royal Blackburn Teaching Hospital (GB), East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon